Commentary

Report: State, individuals will have to pony up big bucks if voter ID amendment passes

A new report from the good people at the North Carolina Budget and Tax Center reveals another reason to be very concerned about the proposed constitutional amendment on the fall ballot that would require a photo ID to vote: cost.

The report (“The Cost of Creating Barriers to Vote: A preliminary analysis of the Constitutional amendment requiring photo identification at the polls”) finds that the new requirement would likely cost state and local government a minimum of around $12 million. That’s enough money to fund any number of important public programs, including modernizing state voting systems to make them less susceptible to hackers.

The report also finds high costs for the more than 218,000 individuals in North Carolina who are currently estimated to not have acceptable identification — between $18.9 million and $25.2 million. These costs will be disproportionately borne by people of color, older people and people of low income. The costs will be especially burdensome for individuals in rural communities who already face significant economic barriers.

And that’s probably not all of it. As the report puts it:

“To be clear, the costs could be far greater than this preliminary estimate suggests given the lack of clear language in the ballot and the resulting need for additional action by the legislature to define implementation of the change, should voters approve it in November. The uncertainties include whether the state will provide an identification card with no fee, the types of acceptable identification that will be allowed, the ability for North Carolina voters to receive an identification by providing necessary supporting documents without paying a fee, and the degree to which North Carolina will commit to educating voters, providing staffing to address wait times, and printing and processing provisional ballots for voters without identification.

Moreover, this report does not attempt to quantify the broader costs to society and the economy of erecting barriers to voting. Historically, across the country, certain politicians have attempted to use restrictive voting laws to rig the system for the wealthy few while cutting funds for our public education, health care, and disaster response. Barriers to full participation in the democratic process could deter the ability of communities’ to quickly and effectively identify and address their own needs and have been demonstrated to reduce economic mobility. It could erode trust and further divide people in ways that worsen our state’s ability to reach its full civic and economic potential.”

The report’s bottom line finding: Rather than erecting new unnecessary barriers, North Carolina could and should pursue smart public investments to protect the vote and ensure fuller participation in the democratic process for all North Carolinians.

Let’s hope voters reject the costly and unnecessary amendment.

2 Comments


  1. Marcos nR

    September 25, 2018 at 3:09 pm

    What enormous fee?…the ID card would cost about as much as a pack of cigarettes (6-8$)… You need ID to cash a check, open a bank account, buy cigarettes and alcohol… Emergencies… hospital treatment, the list goes on and on…
    I am not buying into that agenda of oppression by Photo ID…
    GET REAL…

  2. Jim

    September 25, 2018 at 6:01 pm

    Given that under almost 10 years of GOP control that they have never caught more than a dozen or so people voting fraudulently this seems like a ridiculous amount of money to spend. Better off to spend this much money to encourage more citizens to vote, getting thousands more legitimate votes vs discouraging a dozen makes more sense and is more Democratic.

Check Also

Georgia takes a different approach from NC to smokable hemp

The North Carolina General Assembly is going ahead ...

Top Stories from NCPW

  • News
  • Commentary

WASHINGTON – GOP megadonors and allies of President Trump are helping Sen. Thom Tillis bulk up his c [...]

The last time the Earth experienced a July this hot was well, we don’t know for sure. Such extremes [...]

Medicaid expansion is not just a moral imperative — it could provide a much-needed tonic for the fis [...]

Ag Commissioner Troxler opts in; 770 workers under Treasurer Folwell, Labor Commissioner Berry will [...]

When North Carolina officials put a stop, at least for the time being, to a badly mishandled contrac [...]

The post Cooper to Trump: “Not so fast” appeared first on NC Policy Watch. [...]

If there is a single brightest and most hopeful bit of news on the North Carolina public policy hori [...]

Thirty-two seconds. That’s how long it took for the madman responsible for the carnage in Dayton, Oh [...]