Courts & the Law, Defending Democracy, News

Plaintiffs ask U.S. Supreme Court to affirm partisan gerrymandering rulings

The League of Women Voters and Common Cause has asked the U.S. Supreme Court to affirm a lower court’s second opinion that the state’s 2016 congressional map is the result of unconstitutional partisan gerrymandering.

The high court sent League of Women Voters v. Rucho and Common Cause v. Rucho back down to a three-judge panel of the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina for consideration after justices released opinions in two other similar partisan gerrymandering cases: Gill v. Whitford, a challenge to Republican partisan gerrymandering in Wisconsin, and Benisek v. Lamone, a challenge to a Democratic partisan gerrymander in Maryland.

The panel came to the same decision it did the first time around and struck down 13 congressional districts as unconstitutional partisan gerrymanders.

“In its thorough decision, the district court scrupulously followed this roadmap,” states one of the motions to affirm the panel’s findings. “For each North Carolina congressional district in which it found standing to allege partisan vote dilution, the court held that the district had packed or cracked Democratic voters. The court further held that a plaintiff living in each district could have been unpacked or uncracked by an alternative map.”

The League of Women Voters plaintiffs ask the high court to summarily affirm the panel’s findings “since this case’s exceptional facts violate any plausible gerrymandering standard.” They acknowledge, however, in the document that the importance of the issue may warrant a full briefing.

Common Cause plaintiffs ask for the same.

“The blatant partisan gerrymandering in North Carolina has robbed voters of their voice for at least three election cycles and it will do so again in November,” said Bob Phillips, executive director of Common Cause North Carolina. “The legislative leaders’ unmitigated gall in manipulating district lines for partisan power brings into sharp focus how serious partisan gerrymandering is. If the Supreme Court takes this case, we are confident we will ultimately prevail.”

Rick Hasen, a professor of law and political science at the University of California Irvine School of Law, said on his Election Law Blog that he expects the Supreme Court to set the case for argument. He added that he believes the chances the court will affirm the panel’s findings are law with Justice Brett Kavanaugh now on the court.

Read both full requests to affirm below:

18-422 Motion to Affirm by NC Policy Watch on Scribd

Rucho v Common Cause Motion to Affirm by the Common Cause Appellees 11-2-18 by NC Policy Watch on Scribd

Check Also

NAACP in voter ID, tax cap litigation appeal: Illegal actions have consequences

Illegal actions have consequences — that’s the message ...

Top Stories from NCPW

  • News
  • Commentary

Van der Vaart: supporter of Trump, critic of regulation, was in charge during some of the state [...]

North Carolina voting rights groups and Democrats were compared to the legendary Pied Piper at the s [...]

More than 10 pollution sources, including two Superfund sites, are within a mile of the new Aberdeen [...]

Report authors, advocates differ over possible side effects On Monday, the Congressional Budget Offi [...]

The right-wing wallflowers of The Wall Street Journal reported Sunday, with an almost palpable sense [...]

The post Hofeller: The GOP’s “Michelangelo of the gerrymander” appeared first on NC Policy Watch. [...]

It’s going to happen eventually. It may not be right away and it may not look exactly like it ought [...]

You have to wonder: What would U.S. Chief Justice John Roberts Jr. tell that proud North Carolina ge [...]