News

UNC report suggests $2 million “mobile force platoon” to deal with protests

This week’s big news story on the Silent Sam Confederate monument is the UNC-Chapel Hill Board of Trustees recommendation for a $5.3 million center in which to house the controversial statue.

The notion of the statue’s return to campus in a special university history center – which will cost $800,000 a year to operate – didn’t land well with students, staff and faculty.

But the movement of people opposing the statue may want to reserve some outrage for other recommendations in the report released Monday.

In a summary of the findings of a panel of security professionals, the report suggests the creation of  “at least on” 40-member “mobile force platoon” – a standing force of law enforcement officers who can travel to whichever university may be experiencing large-scale protests.

The cost of creating such a force? Two million dollars a year, plus $500,000 in equipment.


That line about “recent decisions of some Orange County judges” adding to security risks appears to be a reference to the dismissal of the case against a UNC lecturer charged with simple assault at the August rally at which the Silent Sam statue was toppled and a judge declining to punish Maya Little, a UNC graduate student who splashed blood and red paint on the statue.

The UNC Board of Governors, which expanded punishments related to protests under a new campus speech policy last year, is likely to take the mobile force recommendations very seriously.

The board meets next week, during which it will discuss the UNC-Chapel Hill trustees’ recommendations.

2 Comments


  1. Paul Jones

    December 4, 2018 at 6:22 pm

    Note not just $2M but $2M annually. In four years, the amount spent on the SWAT team would be greater than the $5.3M on the Sam Shrine.

  2. Joe Killian

    December 5, 2018 at 10:25 am

    Indeed. Posted the actual paragraph that uses the word “annually” but have added that to the top to make that even clearer.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Check Also

Hearing set for January 11 in 9th Congressional District ballot fraud case

There will be a public evidentiary hearing on ...

Top Stories from NCPW

  • News
  • Commentary

They could be paved, mined, jammed with concrete, filled with pollutants like GenX or coal ash: More [...]

Shortly after 10 o’clock yesterday morning, a federal jury in the hog nuisance case Gillis vs. Murph [...]

North Carolina state law would seem to provide just two options for Wayne County school leaders, clo [...]

Perhaps the sixth time is the charm? Rep. David Lewis (R-Harnett) unveiled another attempt Tuesday b [...]

Fayetteville is my hometown more than any – I was born here to military parents, this is where my gr [...]

It’s long been understood by those who pay attention to public policy debates that the age-old conse [...]

The post The newest nuisance in the 9th: Election Fraud Scandal appeared first on NC Policy Watch. [...]

Earlier this week, the UNC-Chapel Hill Board of Trustees (BoT) began plans to erect a statue dedicat [...]