Editorial busts four key myths behind “cruel and thoughtless” Berger-Moore Medicaid blockade

Be sure to check out the lead editorial this morning on WRAL.com — “Moore, Berger flat-out wrong. Compromise, expand Medicaid now.” In it, the authors cite Wake Forest University Health Law Professor Mark Hall as he busts four key myths advanced by the defenders of North Carolina’s Medicaid blockade:

THE MYTH: “There is no guarantee of continued federal funding, which could put North Carolina taxpayers on the hook for billions of dollars (e.g. N.C. Health Choice).”
THE FACTS: The federal government has never scaled back Medicaid funding before. Even though it could, in theory, cut back funding that’s also true for current Medicaid funding. There’s also a simple way to address this concern, as has been done in Arkansas, Arizona, Indiana and Virginia, among others. Include a provision that expansion authorization sunsets if federal funding changes.

THE MYTH: “Medicaid expansion puts able-bodied, working-age adults ahead of those with intellectual and developmental disabilities.”
THE FACTS: Funds for expansion do not divert any current funding for disabled care. Instead, credible research shows that waiting lists for disabled enrollees have grown worse in non-expansion states like North Carolina than in expansion states. Also, in no sense does expansion put anyone “ahead of” people with disabilities. Instead, both groups would now be on par with regard to coverage for essential medical care.

THE MYTH: “Expansion will force the traditional Medicaid population (children, expectant mothers, the elderly) to compete with the able-bodied working-age adults for access to limited doctors.”
THE FACTS: Other states that have expanded Medicaid have not faced major provider capacity problems, in part because expansion provides more funding to hire “physician extenders” such as nurse practitioners.

THE MYTH: “Medicaid expansion will not solve the rural health access crisis because there are already too few doctors to care for people in those communities.”
THE FACTS: While expansion will not solve physician shortages, it will certainly help recruit more providers by substantially increasing funding for rural health care. Additionally, it reduces the burden that rural physicians face of providing uncompensated care for low-income uninsured people. Another way expansion helps rural areas is by helping to keep rural hospitals open. States like North Carolina that have not expanded Medicaid have seen many more rural hospital closures than have expansion states.

As the editorial puts it in conclusion:

There are plenty of good reasons for the governor to veto the budget legislative leaders will shove through the General Assembly. But none surpass failure to expand Medicaid.

here’s still time for legislative leaders to reach a reasonable and acceptable compromise with the governor to expand Medicaid.

Sen. Phil Berger, Speaker Tim Moore, show some good faith and some concern for ALL North Carolinians. Agree to expand Medicaid now.

Amen.

Top Stories from NCPW

  • News
  • Commentary

GenX, a chemical compound found in the drinking water of more than 1 million North Carolinians, is f [...]

Students reported headaches, nausea, vomiting, but say their concerns about poor ventilation were di [...]

Tool allows magistrates to make more effective decisions on when to impose bail requirements The UNC [...]

WASHINGTON — The Biden administration is making a significant push for new offshore wind development [...]

By any fair assessment, the United States has come a long way over the last century and a half in ov [...]

The post Running in place appeared first on NC Policy Watch. [...]

If there’s one enduring myth in America, it’s that there’s nothing we can really do to end poverty. [...]

Veteran Triangle-area Congressman David Price called it a career yesterday and revealed that he will [...]

Now Hiring

The North Carolina Justice Center is seeking a Courts, Law & Democracy Reporter for NC Policy Watch, to investigate, analyze and report on the federal and state judicial systems. This position will cover criminal and civil justice issues in the General Assembly and executive branch agencies, issues related to elections and voting, and other topics.

APPLY HERE.