News

U.S. House votes to ban new offshore drilling

NC delegation splits along part lines, with one curious exception

WASHINGTON — North Carolina Republican Rep. Patrick McHenry voted this week to ban drilling off Florida’s Gulf Coast, but he voted against a bill to prohibit drilling off of the coasts of North Carolina and other Atlantic states.

The votes came as U.S. House lawmakers approved bipartisan legislation Wednesday that would block new offshore drilling off the majority of the U.S. coast — despite pushback from many Republicans.

The legislation would put in place far-reaching new protections, blocking drilling off most of the Atlantic and Pacific coasts. Lawmakers are scheduled to vote Thursday on a similar ban for drilling in the Arctic Ocean.

Rep. Patrick McHenry

The efforts take aim at the Trump administration’s push to open up vast new areas of the U.S. coasts to oil and gas exploration.

But the sweeping proposals face an uncertain future. It’s unlikely that Republican leadership in the Senate will act on the legislation and the White House has threatened to veto the bills.

Congress voted 238-189 to pass H.R. 1941, the Coastal and Marine Economies Act, which blocks the Interior Department from seeking any new drilling off the Pacific or Atlantic coasts. Twelve Republicans voted for the bill; five Democrats voted against it.

The House also voted 248-180 in favor of H.R. 205, a proposal from Rep. Francis Rooney (R-Fla.) that would block oil and gas leasing in the Gulf of Mexico off the coast of Florida. There is already a moratorium on oil and gas drilling in the eastern Gulf of Mexico that expires in June 2022. This bill would permanently extend it.

Twenty-two Republicans, including McHenry, voted in favor of Rooney’s bill dealing with the Florida coast; five Democrats voted against it.

“Rep. McHenry has long been a supporter of energy exploration of our nation’s coasts and continues to believe it can be an important resource to ensure American energy independence,” a spokeswoman for McHenry said in a statement. “However—because of concerns raised by military leaders and the Department of Defense on the impact drilling will have on vital national security operations in the eastern Gulf of Mexico—Rep. McHenry supported the moratorium on drilling there.”

Without any new protections in place, states including Virginia, North Carolina, Florida, Georgia, Maine, Maryland and other coastal states could see a number of new lease sales in the coming years.

Rep. David Price

Lawmakers on both sides of the aisle have pushed for measures that would limit drilling along their own state’s shorelines. With the exception of McHenry’s vote on H.R. 205, however, all North Carolina representatives voted along party lines, with Democrats Alma Adams, G.K. Butterfield and David Price voting “yes” on both measures and Republicans Ted Budd, Virginia Foxx, George Holding, Richard Hudson, Mark Meadows, David Rouzer and Mark Walker voting “no.”

In response to the vote, Congressman Price issued a statement that included the following:

“Deepwater Horizon was the largest oil spill in American history and the second largest in the world. The Trump administration’s proposal to roll back key safety regulations puts all of the nation’s coastlines at risk of another Deepwater Horizon level catastrophe. This amendment puts the interests of American workers, coastal communities, and marine wildlife first, rather than prioritizing the pocketbooks of large oil corporations. It would ensure that carefully crafted regulations are protected from arbitrary executive actions that would seek to undermine safety and jeopardize our environment. I take pride in North Carolina’s beautiful and abundant coast, and I will continue to do everything I can in Congress to protect all 300 miles of the North Carolina coastline. I am extremely pleased that this legislation passed the House of Representatives, and I urge my colleagues in the Senate to take it up without delay.”

GOP opposition

The Trump administration has pushed for massive new oil and gas exploration in ocean waters, as part of the administration’s “all of the above” energy policy. The Interior Department regularly drafts new five-year plans for oil and gas leasing.

The Trump administration’s proposal for 2019-2024 would open drilling up and down the West Coast and Atlantic Seaboard, including some areas that have been closed for decades. Interior Secretary David Bernhardt put a pause on those plans while the administration litigates whether some areas should be open to drilling. But in the meantime, opponents of drilling want to block future development.

Then-President Barack Obama banned drilling in canyons of the Atlantic Ocean and vast parts of the Arctic Ocean. But President Donald Trump signed an executive order in 2017 to throw out those drilling bans. Environmental groups have challenged the Trump drilling plans, and they are still tied up in court.

The Coastal and Marine Economies Protection Act would permanently remove from consideration acreage for offshore leasing on both the Atlantic and Pacific outer continental shelf. Lawmakers accepted an amendment from Rep. Andy Levin (D-Mich.) and  Rep. Don Beyer (D-Va.) that also puts a moratorium on oil, gas and methane seismic activities.

“At a time when global temperatures are steadily rising and the habitats of imperiled species are increasingly unstable, we have every reason to ensure the health and security of our coastlines,” Beyer said in a statement. “Congress took a major step today to preserve those coastlines and push back against yet another handout from the Trump administration to the fossil fuel industry.”

Republicans warned that the legislation would clamp down too hard on energy development.

Rep. Ben Cline (R-Va.) said that developing oil and gas resources off the Virginia coast could “bring thousands of jobs to Virginia and significantly boost its economy.”

Cline said it’s “fine” if other states don’t want drilling revenue. “But the federal government should not be in the business of halting Virginia — and in turn America’s — economic growth,” he said. “Failing to give states like mine the ability to explore the resources off our coast would be a grave disservice to my constituents, our Commonwealth and our nation.”

Rep. Buddy Carter (R-Ga.) said “blanket bans” that would be imposed by this legislation are “misguided and are quite plainly the wrong approach.”

Carter has asked the administration to remove Georgia from consideration for offshore exploration, but he said states ought to be empowered to make their own decisions.

Veto threat

The Trump administration issued a veto threat, saying the legislation would put too many restrictions on the country’s ability to explore for the best oil and gas resources. The White House said the legislation would “tie the hands of future administrations and reduce their ability to enhance energy security.”

Environmentalists applauded the legislation, which they say will help protect oceans, marine life and coastal communities from the pollution that comes with offshore drilling and development.

“Legislating to prevent offshore drilling is important, especially now, given that the Trump administration has proposed the most extreme offshore drilling we have ever seen,” said Alexandra Adams of the Natural Resources Defense Council. “Members of Congress acting swiftly and quickly now is really critical.”

House lawmakers have also included amendments in their annual Interior Department spending bill that would block offshore drilling along most U.S. shores in 2020.

Oil and gas drilling has gained some attention among Democratic presidential hopefuls, with candidates speaking out against offshore drilling on the campaign trail and at a recent CNN town hall about climate change. Democratic presidential candidate Beto O’Rourke released a statement this week backing the Coastal and Marine Economies Act.

“Offshore drilling threatens the local wildlife and water of communities in South Carolina and across the country while also undermining economic opportunity,” O’Rourke said in a news release. He has made five campaign trips to South Carolina, an early voting state.

The lead sponsor of the bill to ban offshore drilling, Rep. Joe Cunningham (D-S.C.),  leveraged his opposition to offshore drilling in his 2018 campaign, when he flipped a seat that had long been in Republican control. Cunningham’s district includes Charleston, S.C., and stretches along the coastline.

Allison Winter is a reporter for the Washington, DC bureau of The Newsroom network of which NC Policy Watch is a member. Newsroom Washington bureau chief Robin Bravender and Policy Watch director Rob Schofield contributed to this report.

Check Also

Critics warn Trump EPA’s coal ash plan will let polluters off the hook

WASHINGTON — The Trump administration wants to give ...

Top Stories from NCPW

  • News
  • Commentary

Members of the UNC Board of Governors publicly condemned member Tom Fetzer’s secret, independent inv [...]

North Carolinians were presented with more than a dozen congressional maps by Tuesday night and had [...]

After a weeks-long storm of investigations, leaks and accusations of unethical behavior on North Car [...]

When it began in 1919, it was “Armistice Day” — a celebration of the end of World War I. It became a [...]

“The hymn in church yesterday,” Dan Gerlach, the embattled former ECU interim chancellor, tweeted Su [...]

Back in the early 1990’s, the late and sorely missed Bob Hensley – a talented, feisty and frequently [...]

The post Berger on shaky ground appeared first on NC Policy Watch. [...]

Today marks 100 days since I filed an official request with the Department of Public Instruction to [...]