Defending Democracy, News

U.S. House green-lights Trump impeachment inquiry

President Donald Trump (Credit: Gage Skidmore/Wikimedia Commons)

WASHINGTON — The U.S. House on Thursday voted to formalize its impeachment inquiry against President Donald Trump.

Lawmakers adopted a resolution that lays out procedures for the inquiry that is already taking place in the House. That investigation is centered on whether the president abused his power by attempting to pressure the president of Ukraine to investigate Trump’s political opponent.

The measure passed largely along partisan lines by a vote of 232-196, with no Republicans backing the resolution. One independent, Justin Amash of Michigan, voted in favor of the resolution and two Democrats voted against it. All 13 North Carolina representatives voted along party lines.

Democrats hailed the resolution as a roadmap that will provide for a fair and transparent process, while Republicans supportive of the president assailed the effort as a political attack.

“What is at stake in all of this is nothing less than our democracy,” House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) said ahead of the vote. “Sadly, this is not any cause for any glee or comfort. This is something that is very solemn.”

House Democratic leadership had previously announced a formal inquiry, but held a floor vote in part to combat complaints from Republicans that the full chamber hadn’t been allowed to vote. Still, Thursday’s vote is unlikely to reduce the partisan fighting over the process.

Trump wrote on Twitter Thursday morning, “The Impeachment Hoax is hurting our Stock Market. The Do Nothing Democrats don’t care!” He added later, “The Greatest Witch Hunt In American History!”

Trump’s critics in the House insist that the president’s behavior and their constitutional obligations have driven them to pursue their investigation.

“The House impeachment inquiry has discovered a substantial body of evidence that the president of the United States has violated the Constitution by placing his political interests above the interests of the country, thereby putting both our democracy and the nation’s security in jeopardy,” said Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-Md.). “In light of this evidence, the House of Representatives must fully investigate.”

Raskin said the impeachment inquiry guidelines are “fair and strong and make sure that we can and will defend the Constitution of the United States.”

Rep. Mary Gay Scanlon (D-Pa.) said on the House floor, “I take no joy in contemplating the impeachment of a president, because in contemplating it, we must acknowledge a threat to our constitution and the values that bind us, not only as members of Congress but as Americans.”

House lawmakers, Scanlon added, have tried to investigate allegations of Trump’s misconduct using “traditional means,” only to be “stonewalled” by the White House.

Rep. Brendan Boyle (D-Pa.) said he didn’t come to Congress to pursue an impeachment process, but “the facts demand it.” He added, “What we decide today will say more about us than it says about the conduct of the president.”

Rep. Alcee Hastings (D-Fla.) said, “It’s time for the American people to see how the administration put our national security on the auction block in exchange for political favors.” 

Another Florida Democrat, freshman Rep. Donna Shalala, served in the Clinton administration during President Bill Clinton’s impeachment. “Supporting this continuing inquiry is not a decision that any of us makes lightly,” she said. “It’s with profound sadness and disappointment that we have to continue this investigation. The accusations the House is investigating go straight to the heart of our Constitution.”

Rep. Joe Neguse (D-Colo.) said the vote marks “a serious and solemn day for our country.”

The House’s impeachment inquiry, he added, “has exposed the truth and uncovered significant evidence that the president abused his power. To honor the oath to defend the Constitution that each of us took, we must move forward with this impeachment inquiry.”

Republican lawmakers continued to decry the process, drawing criticisms from Democrats that they’re making procedural arguments to avoid discussing the president’s behavior.

“No matter what is said by the other side today, this is a dark day and a cloud has fallen on this House,” said Rep. Doug Collins (R-Ga.), the top Republican on the House Judiciary Committee.

“The resolution before us today is not about transparency, it’s about control. It’s not about fairness, it’s about winning,” he said.

Rep. Debbie Lesko (R-Ariz.) called the impeachment process “a total sham.” The resolution, “which seeks to legitimize it, misleads the American public.”

Some moderate Democrats who voted for the inquiry stressed that their support for the investigation does not indicate how they may ultimately vote on articles of impeachment.

House lawmakers could vote as soon as this year on articles of impeachment against the president. If approved, the articles would be the subject of a trial in the Senate, where the GOP-led chamber is unlikely to vote to convict the president.

Robin Bravender is the Washington bureau chief for the States Newsroom Network, of which NC Policy Watch is a member.

One Comment

  1. Ken Sears

    November 4, 2019 at 2:21 pm

    Is it dawning on you as it is on me what contemptible, unparalleled cowardice prompted some certain still anonymous cowering-in-the-darkness somebodies to make Eric Ciaramella their stooge in advancing this malignant “whistleblower” fraud?

    Why didn’t THEY do the putative whistleblowing?

    Because they wouldn’t risk their names or careers, that’s why.

    So they con this 30-year-old, probably with promises of future glory and power.

    And if it flops, well, the kid is dispensable.

    This is Stalinesque in its depravity.

    My gut sense: Vindman, who is likely the infamous “Whistleblower 2”, is the one who gave Ciaramella, “Whistleblower 1”, the phony story about Trump (phony stories about Trump—not a first for Ciaramella) to go “blow” to Schiff&Co.

    So, ironically, the shadowy, shady “Whistleblower 2” in the media’s lingo is really the one who should have been Whistleblower 1, but he was too monumental a coward to risk it. So he used the pathetic puppy Ciaramella as his stooge.

    Even if my guess about Vindman is wrong, it doesn’t change this: whoever used Ciaramella to launch the bogus whistleblower report is a fetid manipulating coward who wouldn’t put himself on the line to do it himself.

    And then, when all hell starting breaking loose and Trump published the transcript and it looked like Ciaramella would get exposed, Vindman or “other” filed his own farce of a “whistleblower report”…to get protection from the coming legal storm.

    All these years this horror show has been unfolding I have avoided using the phrase “Deep State” because I just wasn’t sure I wanted to take on such conspiracy-theory language.

    Well, forget that. The Deep State is there, and it thinks it’s God.

Check Also

George Floyd’s brother: ‘Make sure that he is more than another face on a T-shirt’

WASHINGTON — George Floyd’s younger brother, Philonise Floyd, ...

Top Stories from NCPW

  • News
  • Commentary

Dreamers looking for bold action from a new administration President-elect Joe Biden said last week [...]

Outgoing administration proposes to bring back use of electrocution, firing squads People on federal [...]

Two-thirds of 107 schools in North Carolina met or exceeded academic growth goals Granville County S [...]

Donald Trump's baseless, nonstop public allegations of pervasive fraud, election meddling and d [...]

#StoptheStupid. That little zinger of a Twitter hashtag drew national headlines in recent days after [...]

The post The Spike appeared first on NC Policy Watch. [...]

There’s been a great deal of introspection and handwringing by North Carolina progressives in recent [...]

The post A verdict to give thanks for appeared first on NC Policy Watch. [...]