Courts & the Law, COVID-19, News

NC judge considering whether to order more robust COVID-19 prison response

Wake County Superior Court Judge Vince Rozier hears arguments Tuesday over video conference.

Two attorneys for several civil rights organizations and incarcerated people alleged in court today that the state is not doing enough to protect detention populations from contracting COVID-19.

They asked Wake County Superior Court Judge Vince Rozier to order a more robust plan with a faster release schedule to reduce the incarcerated population in North Carolina. They suggested the state start with the release of 3,000 incarcerated people who have 60 days or less to complete their sentence.

The hearing for a temporary restraining order was conducted remotely over a WebEx video conference system due to COVID-19 restrictions.

Attorneys for the state argued that releasing 3,000 people from prison would overwhelm the system and not be possible. In the regular course of business, the North Carolina Department of Public Safety (DPS) releases upward of 2,000 people per month.

“The types of arguments that defendants are making about administrative hurdles are arguments that almost always get made when states are ordered to cure constitutional violations, but administrative difficulties do not excuse constitutional violations,” said Leah Kang, an attorney with the ACLU of North Carolina. “We are not, moreover, asking this court to, as the defendants characterize it, ‘open up the doors and let everybody out without any follow-up, any process.'”

DPS reported today that there are 596 incarcerated people who have tested positive for COVID-19, and 1,143 tests have been performed. There have been two reported deaths of incarcerated people related to the virus.

Stephanie Brennan, an attorney representing the defendants — the state and DPS — argued that the prisons already are doing everything they can to protect incarcerated people. They have canceled visitations, reduced the intake of people from jails and implemented the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention guidelines to the extent possible in detention facilities.

She added that DPS is reducing the incarcerated population, it’s just not happening as fast as the plaintiffs would like it to. According to court filings, they have released or “will soon release” about 647 people — roughly 2% of the 33,000 who are in custody.

Kang said it’s not enough, and it consigns tens of thousands of others to dangerous exposure to a highly contagious and sometimes deadly virus. There already are large outbreaks at Neuse Correctional Institution and the N.C. Correctional Institution for Women.

She focused on the fact that social distancing is impossible in prison, and said it makes conditions there unconstitutional. She pointed out that medical and public health experts have uniformly stated that incarcerated people are particularly vulnerable to the disease; Kang submitted an expert affidavit in the case stating it is “necessary and urgent” that state officials reduce the prison population.

“Moreover, the more modest measures defendants say they are taking and on which they heavily rely (providing masks and masks, and doing more cleaning) are insufficient to meet their duty under the constitution to keep the people who are under their custody safe,” she said. “Plaintiffs also submitted multiple affidavits from currently incarcerated people that bring into question whether these other measures (masks, cleaning) have been applied with fidelity and uniformly across DPS prisons.”

Tammera Hill, an attorney for the defendants, argued that running a prison is inherently discretionary. She said the decisions about how to do it should be left up to the “boots on the ground” people who have been making decisions all along, not the court. Releasing incarcerated people, she added, takes time, and they have to consider minimum sentences and reentry information, such where they would go after being released.

Kang told Rozier that there is an expansive reentry network in North Carolina with organizations and community groups offering to step up their efforts to make sure people who are released are not on the streets.

“It is more dangerous for all of us if you just shutter the doors of the prison and try to keep everyone locked inside,” she added. “The bottom line is, your honor, the state has a wide range of tools for release here. They have failed to use them to the extent that they need to make social distancing possible for incarcerated people.”

Whitley Carpenter from Forward Justice also argued for the plaintiffs.

The plaintiffs are seeking a preliminary injunction from the judge ordering the defendants to take any and all steps to allow for social distancing, which means they would have to decrease the number of people in custody. Kang offered to draft a plan for the judge, or she said DPS could come back with a better plan, or the court could appoint a special master to help the parties come up with one.

Whatever the plan, Kang said, it must include a written document with a facility-by-facility approach for reducing the prison population.

Rozier took all the arguments under advisement and said he hopes to make a ruling by the end of the week.

2 Comments


  1. Heather Clements

    April 28, 2020 at 9:31 pm

    My husband is incarcerated and is due to be released in 18 months, I pray to God every night that he gets released, and doesn’t get coronavirus. He has medical conditions and I fear for his life. I’m grateful for all of those involved in working on the release of these at risk men and women.I hope that the right decision is made. The men and women that are incarcerated in North Carolina don’t have a fighting chance unless we reduce the population in these facilities. If they are within 3 years of there release date, those who are ill, elderly,and pregnant should be released. Regardless of whether they’re considered violent or non-violent, that part doesn’t and shouldn’t matter. In most articles it’s specified, non-violent only. Most of those considered violent are not repeat offenders, and are not violent people. Release these people, save their lives!

  2. Terri Light

    April 29, 2020 at 9:26 pm

    My son is incarcerated I pray to God every night that he gets released, and doesn’t get coronavirus. He has medical conditions and I fear for his life. I’m thankful for all of those working on the release of these at risk men and women.I hope that the right decision is made. Those incarcerated in North Carolina don’t have a fighting chance unless the population in these facilities are reduced. They are way overcrowded and mostly due to the structured sentencing that NC has – some people don’t have a chance they just go by that structure and boom there you are in prison for years.They don’t look at the character or circumstances and you have DA’s that are “political” and try to just put another conviction on their record to try to get re-elected.Those who are ill, at risk like my son with diabetes, elderly, and pregnant should be released. There are family members wives, kids and parents that need them at home to help during this time. Some of these wives don’t have any help and are trying to juggle work and schooling kids and worrying if their husband will survive. Before this covid 19 started I sent a request in for sentence reduction and haven’t heard anything. One of my issues with how the prison system is handling this – its hard to phathom that the federal and state government has mandated that ALL US citizens maintain 6 feet apart and no more than 10 people in a gathering – I know its impossible to do that in a prison but they could release more than they are THINKING about doing. They need to talk to the wardens of each prison and those wardens need to get with case managers and review each inmate and start releasing them..I wonder how many law suits will be started when these inmates die

Check Also

Report: NC receives failing grade in response to COVID-19 in jails

In a report released this month, the ACLU ...

Join Our Team

NC Policy Watch is hiring two new journalists to join our award-winning team. Click here for more information.  

Top Stories from NCPW

  • News
  • Commentary

As part of our ongoing effort to inform North Carolinians about the state judiciary, Policy Watch is [...]

Even with an increase in absentee voting, election directors expect a large in-person turnout. Since [...]

Irwin Detention Facility has history of physical and verbal abuse Top U.S. House Democrats are inves [...]

As part of our ongoing effort to inform North Carolinians about the state judiciary, Policy Watch is [...]

Talk from Republican senators about "rules" and "precedent" is nothing but a smo [...]

Supreme Court hypocrisy, effort to infiltrate progressive NC groups ought to be the last straws It s [...]

For many parents and caregivers, seeing their child struggle through virtual learning can be both fr [...]

Click here for the original story. The post The far-right go fishin’ appeared first on NC Policy Wat [...]