Glazier on HB 730: ‘At some point we ought to follow the law’ (video)

1 Comment

May 16, 2013 at 6:26 pmCategory:Uncategorized

by

Freshman Rep. Jacqueline Schaffer used a parliamentary maneuver to end debate in the House Thursday on her bill which would place further limits on abortion.

House Bill 730 – the Insurance & Health Care Conscience Protection Act -  would prohibit local governments from offering health plans that include abortion coverage to employees, and prohibit health care plans offered through the exchange under the Affordable Care Act from offering coverage for elective abortion procedures. The measure further allows public hospital employees to refuse to participate in abortion care if they object on religious or moral grounds.

Rep. Rick Glazier said lawmakers were wrong to interfere in “one of the most intense, personal, spiritual, and private decisions” a person could make, warning the courts have struck down portions of this bill in other states:

“The Affordable Care Act preempts what we are trying to do on the floor. At some point, we ought to follow the law,” said the Cumberland County Democrat.

Rep. Schaffer argued the legislation protects the rights of conscience of all health care providers, and has nothing to do with restricting access to abortion.

The bill passed 72-39 to survive the crossover deadline, and now heads to the Senate. To hear Rep. Glazier speak on the bill, click below:

YouTube Preview Image

The tax debate in one compelling picture

No Comments

May 16, 2013 at 4:36 pmCategory:Uncategorized

by

The following picture from the good folks at Together NC  tells provides the main information you need to know about the right’s move to shift North Carolina’s tax code away from income taxes and toward sales taxes:

What’s it like to wake up from a Tea Party binge?

No Comments

May 16, 2013 at 2:43 pmCategory:Uncategorized

by

From the annals of  ”we have seen the future,”  Mother Jones schools us on what’s happened in Florida under two years of Tea Party control:

In just one year, Scott and his conservative allies slashed state spending by $4 billion even as they cut corporate taxes. They’ve rejected billions in federal funds in one of the states hardest hit by the recession. They’ve axed everything from health care and public transportation initiatives to mosquito control and water supply programs.

The results are not pretty.

The link between the IRS scandal and redistricting in North Carolina

2 Comments

May 16, 2013 at 2:36 pmCategory:Uncategorized

by

President Obama 4No, the above headline is not a typo or even a logical stretch. There is actually a close relationship between the two subjects. Here’s why:

Although all the facts have yet to come to light, the recent scandal in Washington related to the wrongful targeting of conservative groups by Internal Revenue Service officials appears to be just that: a scandal. Every American should be outraged anytime the people in power abuse the system to target any group or individual because of their beliefs. It is an offensive assault on core constitutional rights anytime such an event occurs. President Obama needs to get to the bottom of this ASAP and punish all who are responsible.

Unfortunately, such occurrences are not new in the United States. They occurred when the George W. Bush administration wrongfully targeted liberal groups (click here and here to read about some examples) AND they occur every time politicians in power draw absurdly gerrymandered political maps to punish their opponents and deny voters the opportunity to participate in real elections. Read More…

‘Modest’ or ‘Bold,’ Nebraska Tax Cuts Could Not Be Sold

No Comments

May 16, 2013 at 1:01 pmCategory:NC Budget and Tax Center

by

This is an additional contribution to the blog series that presents voices from other states that have unsuccessfully pursued comprehensive tax reform. (See Part 1, Part 2 and Part 3)

Commentary provided by Renee Fry, Executive Director of the OpenSky Policy Institute in Lincoln, NE.

Nebraska’s 2013 legislative session kicked off with Gov. Dave Heineman rolling out two proposals that would have drastically cut state taxes.

The first proposal – known as the “bold” plan – would have eliminated the state’s personal and corporate income taxes and replaced the lost revenue by ending several sales tax exemptions, including those for prescription drugs and non-profit groups. The second, more “modest” proposal would have reduced the individual income tax, eliminated the corporate income tax and again made up the lost revenue by eliminating sales tax exemptions – although fewer than were to be axed in the “bold’ proposal.

The tax cuts were sold under the banner of economic development despite research showing no direct correlation between personal income tax levels and economic growth. In fact, Nebraska’s own economic performance refutes the economic development claim – gross state product growth and the unemployment rate for Nebraska are better than most states that have no income tax.

Proponents claimed that the proposals would not reduce the amount of total revenue the state takes in and would not require cuts to education, health care, roads and other vital services that individuals and businesses rely on. But the plan quickly ran into trouble on multiple fronts. Read More…