Some interesting rulings from courts around the country came down on Monday addressing issues that may well land at the U.S. Supreme Court in the near future.
Gun control: A federal appeals court in New York largely upheld gun control laws passed in New York and Connecticut after the 2012 Newton shootings, finding that there was a substantial relationship between bans on the possession of semi-automatic weapons and large-capacity magazines and the states’ compelling interests in controlling crime.
Writing for the 2d U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, Judge Jose A. Cabranes said:
“When used, these weapons tend to result in more numerous wounds, more serious wounds, and more victims. These weapons are disproportionately used in crime, and particularly in criminal mass shootings. They are also disproportionately used to kill law enforcement officers.”
Read the full opinion here.
Defunding Planned Parenthood: While lawmakers in Texas cut state Medicaid funding for Planned Parenthood, a federal district court judge in Louisiana temporarily blocked lawmakers there from doing the same, finding that Planned Parenthood could likely succeed on its claims that the cuts targeted medical services provided to thousands of low-income women and had little to do with the competence of the group’s clinics there.
Calling out the cuts as politically-motivated, U.S. District Judge John deGravelles wrote:
The uncontradicted evidence in the record at this time is that PPGC does not perform abortions in Louisiana, is not involved in the sale of fetal tissue and none of the conduct in question occurred at the PPGC’s two Louisiana facilities. Based on the record before it, it appears likely that Plaintiff will be able to prove that the attempted termination against it are motived and driven, at least in large part, by reasons unrelated to its competence and unique to it.
Campaign finance: The U.S. Supreme Court refused to review a decision out of the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals requiring the group Montanans for Community Development to disclose its donors and spending while it attempts to have state laws that prevent outside groups from coordinating with candidates overturned.
The SCOTUS order is here.