State lawmakers could soon decide to anoint pro-school privatization nonprofit Parents for Educational Freedom in North Carolina (PEFNC) to distribute taxpayer dollars to new charter schools in the state, according to the Associated Press.

From the AP:

The budget proposal being considered by the General Assembly may break new ground in state spending by letting Parents for Educational Freedom in North Carolina decide which fledgling charter schools get a piece of $1 million a year, N.C. Center for Nonprofits vice president David Heinen said.

“This is probably unique to have a completely independent 501(c)(3) nonprofit having discretion without a lot of criteria,” said Heinen, citing the chapter of federal tax law describing charity and educational groups. “I don’t know of any other that is quite like this.”

If the Senate endorses what is currently a House proposal, PEFNC would be tasked with doling out up to $1 million annually in start-up funds for new charter schools (up to $100,000 each) to set up shop in geographic areas where charter schools are few in number.

When the House rolled out this idea earlier this year, lawmakers on both sides of the aisle expressed concern over the idea that a private group beholden to virtually no public oversight could be tasked with handing out taxpayer dollars.

Legislative efforts have attempted to direct similar responsibilities to PEFNC in years past.

In 2013, lawmakers proposed giving the nonprofit $1 million over two years to develop charter schools in rural parts of the state, but that measure did not pass. A similar bill was filed last year too, but also did not survive.

None of the taxpayer funds can go toward administrative or management fees, according to the current proposal. Darrell Allison, executive director of PEFNC, already receives a large compensation package that has has increased considerably over a short time.

In 2010, Allison received $107,889 for his work running the non-profit; in 2012, Allison reported an income of $156,582—a 45 percent pay increase in just two years. In 2013, his salary bumped up again to $167,085, according to tax records.

PEFNC has received millions of dollars from the Walton Family Foundation (owners of Wal-Mart) over the past several years. The Waltons are known for supporting education initiatives such as vouchers, charter schools and other privatization measures.

For more background on PEFNC, click here.

The Senate begins the process of rolling out their budget later today in committee meetings. I’ll be tweeting from Senate Ed at 4pm — follow me on Twitter @LindsayWagnerNC.


This week, researchers from the University of Maryland and Wellesley College released a report that finds that the learning gains young children experience from watching Sesame Street are on par with what students learn in preschool.

From The Washington Post:

The researchers also say those effects probably come from Sesame Street’s focus on presenting viewers with an academic curriculum, heavy on reading and math, that would appear to have helped prepare children for school.

While it might seem implausible that a TV show could have such effects, the results build on Nixon-era government studies that found big short-term benefits in watching the show, along with years of focus-group studies by the team of academic researchers who help write “Sesame Street” scripts. Several outside researchers have reviewed the study, and none are known to have questioned its results.

As my toddler channels the Count when totaling the number of grapes he has in his bowl each day (ha, ha, haaaa, as the Count would say), it’s easy to see the impact of Sesame Street’s strong educational components.

But is Elmo enough?

The study’s authors do point out that preschool—Head Start, in particular, which is targeted toward low-income children— is designed to deliver more than just academics. It also comes with access to medical and dental services, family supports and opportunities for socialization that you can’t get from your television set.

That message, however, got a little buried in the Washington Post story titled, “Study: Kids can learn as much from ‘Sesame Street’ as from preschool.”

“There’s a lot of development that happens in an early education setting,” said Rob Thompson, executive director of the children’s advocacy group NC Child. “Children develop important social and emotional skills in pre-kindergarten that help success in school and in all aspects of life.”

North Carolina has been a beacon that other states look toward for how to do preschool right. The return on investing in NC pre-kindergarten is estimated to be $9 for every dollar spent, according to the N.C. Justice Center.*

High- quality preschool can increase a child’s performance in the early school grades and boost high school graduation rates, improve chances of landing a job later in life, and reduce criminal behavior, among other benefits, according to researchers at the Carolina Institute for Public Policy.

But over the past several years, the state has steadily decreased its support for pre-kindergarten programs that target at-risk youth by reducing the number of pre-K slots available to at-risk children.

“Reduced access to early learning for at-risk youth means that many of these children are likely to begin their primary education lagging their peers,” according the Justice Center report.

Wellesley College’s Phil Levine, co-author of the Sesame Street study, emphasized to NC Policy Watch that the children’s show is a great way to augment a high quality preschool program — not a replacement.

“It’s a mistake to think of these things as one or the other,” said Levine, when comparing Sesame Street to preschool. “What you get in terms of the long term effects from pre-K are partly academic and partly nonacademic—and those nonacademic effects are really important.”

Levine says when it comes to fighting poverty and inequality, there’s no magic bullet.

“The more tools in our arsenal, the better—and Sesame Street is just another good one.”

*NC Policy Watch is a project of the N.C. Justice Center.


Moore County Schools Superintendent Robert Grimesey (Image: Moore County Schools)

It’s been quite a few days for Moore County schools chief Robert Grimesey.

Last week the Moore County school board voted, without explanation, to fire Grimesey, who had been on the job for less than a year.

The move touched off a political firestorm resulting in three board members resigning, Moore County Rep. Jamie Boles filing a temporary restraining order blocking the school board from hiring a new superintendent, and threats of special legislation that would recall the entire school board.

And the community came out in force for Grimesey, buying t-shirts that said #SupportGrimesey and bombarding social media websites calling for his reinstatement.

Last night, the remaining members of the Moore County school board voted 4-1 to bring him back.

“As it has for the past six days, Moore County stands together as one tonight,” Grimesey said following the vote, according to WRAL News. “Not for a man, not for any man, but for its own ideals and its principles. For its economic vitality and its quality of life.”

After the vote, a fourth board member resigned Monday night. Several school board members who initially voted for Grimesey’s firing say it was justified—but because of strict confidentiality laws on personnel issues, they couldn’t say what led to his termination.

Read the full scoop over at WRAL.


Without explanation, the Moore County school board decided last week to fire its superintendent in a 5-3 vote — and since then a political firestorm has erupted, with three members of the board resigning following intense community pressure and a state lawmaker filing a temporary restraining order blocking the board from hiring a new schools chief and threatening special legislation to recall the school board.

Robert Grimesey was fired from his post as Superintendent last week. (Image: Moore County Schools)

Robert Grimesey was fired from his post as Superintendent last week. (Image: Moore County Schools)

“This is a very important issue, and I don’t think the board members understand what they have done to the community,” Rep. Jamie Boles (R-Moore) told WRAL news.

“Who speaks for the citizens who elected the school board,” Boles told N.C. Policy Watch via telephone Monday.

“The citizens of Moore County want the school board recalled and I represent them. I speak for the people, I don’t speak for Jamie Boles.”

Robert Grimesey held the position of Superintendent of Moore County Schools for just under a year. “Strained relationships with some top school administrators and principals,” could be the reason for the school board’s decision, according to the The Pilot, a local online newspaper in Southern Pines.

Strict state personnel laws make it impossible to know the real reason, as board members are barred from discussing these matters.

Members of the community have come out in support of Grimesey. According to The Pilot, social media has lit up with support for the ousted superintendent and even t-shirts that say #SupportGrimesey are being sold in Southern Pines.

Southern Pines Town Councilman Mike Fields encouraged those board members who voted to fire Grimesey to step down from their posts, and state lawmaker Rep. Jamie Boles (R-Moore) told members who voted for the ouster to step down by noon Monday or face special recall legislation. Sen. Jerry Tillman (R-Randolph) said he’d support Moore’s proposed measure.

Rep. Boles has also blocked the school board from making a hiring decision for a new superintendent with a temporary restraining order filed last Friday.

Leanne Winner of the N.C. School Boards Association says she’s never seen a state legislator get involved in the hiring and firing of a superintendent.

“Most of the time we see the General Assembly get involved in school board politics, it is not directly related to a specific incident,” said Winner.

In a Friday press release, Boles said, “I have never seen the continuity and unity of Democrats, Republicans, NAACP, PTA, students, teachers, conservatives and liberals alike as I have seen with the unified condemnation of the process in which our superintendent, Dr. Grimesey, was fired.”

Dr. Ed Dunlap, who has worked for the N.C. School Boards Association for 36 years and is its executive director, says it’s troubling to him that a state lawmaker is getting involved in local school board politics.

“It’s extremely important for the school board and the superintendent to have a good working relationship with each other. [They] need to continually work on that relationship so that the opportunity for these kinds of instances to occur would be mitigated,” said Dunlap.

“This didn’t happen overnight,” Dunlap added.

The Moore County school board will meet this evening at the Union Pines High School in a closed session, then the public will have an opportunity to weigh in on Grimesey’s firing.

For an in-depth story on the Moore County schools drama, including more details about how the county commissioners might financially punish the school board for their actions, check out The Pilot’s latest here.

This post has been updated to add comments from Rep. Jamie Boles.


A day after lengthy discussion about how a significant number of charter school applicants recommended to set up shop in North Carolina were moved forward along with significant reservations about their ability to accomplish their proposed missions, the State Board of Education voted Thursday to approve 12 out of the 18 charter school hopefuls to open in the Fall of 2016.

The State Board rejected outright two charter school applicants, even though the Charter School Advisory Board had recommended they open — albeit in very close votes.

Town Center Charter School, which had hoped to open in Gaston County, was rejected over concerns that its for-profit education management organization, ALS, Inc. has a poor record in other states and could be stretched too thin by operating several charters at once in North Carolina.

Charlotte Classical School, which had hoped to open in Mecklenburg County, was rejected over concerns about its educational plan and weaknesses in its budget proposal.

The State Board decided to delay votes on four charter school applicants, sending them back to the Charter School Advisory Board for further review and investigation.

The applications of two charter schools that would be managed by the Florida-based EMO Newpoint Education Partners—Cape Fear Preparatory (New Hanover) and Pine Springs Preparatory (Wake)—were kicked back to the CSAB so that they could further investigate allegations and charges of grade tampering and other abuses at some of their Florida charter schools. (For more background, click here.)

The State Board also sent back two other charter school applications to the CSAB for further inquiry and evaluation. Those applications were for Capital City Charter High School (Wake) and Unity Classical School (Mecklenburg).

The twelve charter schools that the State Board of Education approved to open in the fall of 2016 are:

Cardinal Charter Academy at Knightdale (Wake)
Central Wake Charter High School (Wake)
FernLeaf Community Charter School (Henderson)
Gateway Charter Academy (Guilford)
Kannapolis Charter Academy (Cabarrus)
Leadership Academy for Young Women (New Hanover)
Mallard Creek STEM Academy (Mecklenburg)
Matthews-Mint Hill Charter Academy (Mecklenburg)
Mooresville Charter Academy (Iredell)
Peak Charter Academy (Wake)
Union Day School (Union)
Union Preparatory Academy at Indian Trail (Union)

Depending on the outcome of the four delayed charter school applications, North Carolina could see as many as 178 charter schools in operation by 2016.