As noted in the post below, one of the myriad last minute additions to the state budget (i.e. the 400-plus page behemoth set to become law tomorrow) that was not present in either the House or Senate versions of the budget is a section added by anti-abortion crusaders to cut funding to Planned Parenthood.
This is a clear violation of House Rules. House Rule 44(b) specifically forbids the addition of such new, out-of-whole-cloth provisions unless the House refers the matter to a standing committee for review — something that is clearly not going to happen today.
What makes this all the more outrageous is that Rep. Stam — the man repeatedly identified in the News & Observer editorial cited below as the driving force behind the Planned Parenthood amendment — has a long history of raising hell on the House floor about… you guessed it…the addition of last minute provisions like this in violation of Rule 44.
In 2009, for instance, Stam took to the House floor (click here at go to 1:42 in the audio) to castigate the budget conference report for making tax changes not included in previous versions of the budget bill. He called the addition of the new provision a “blatant, flagrant and obvious violation of Rule 44(b).”
Stam’s only conceivable excuse in all this is that the current version of Rule 44(b) only applies to the addition of provisions dealing with “significant matters.” Perhaps in the twisted worldview of a person with a demonstrated, career-long indifference to women’s health, the act of harming thousands of women by making it much harder for Planned Parenthood to provide them with essential health care is not a “significant matter.” And given the low to which politics in the General Assembly have sunk in recent years, he’ll no doubt get away with it.
In the real world of words and laws that mean something, however, Stam’s position on this matter can only be described as blatant, flagrant and obvious hypocrisy.