1% sales tax increase six times harder on “working families” than income tax surcharge

Earlier this week budget negotiators announced that they had come to agreement on a revenue plan that would raise $990 million. Most of the revenue would come from a 1% increase in the state sales tax with lesser amounts coming from increases in taxes on purchases of cigarettes and alcohol and a 2% income tax surcharge.

Shortly after this plan was announced the Governor voiced her opposition to it, citing her desire not balance the budget “on the backs of working families.” While I’m all for focusing on working families when it comes to making choices about tax policy, in this instance the Governor’s math is way off.

The fact is that the sales and excise tax increases in the plan would have a far greater impact on working families than the proposed income tax surcharge. In fact the proposal to increase the sales tax by 1% would have cost the middle 20% of income earners ($37,000 annual income) nearly six times more than the proposed income tax surcharge. The sales tax would cost them an estimated $130 in FY 1009-10 compared to a $23 increase in income taxes because of the surcharge.

Since her press conference announcing her budget proposal earlier this year the Governor has continued to imply that somehow taxes on consumption have less impact on taxpayers, insinuating that they are somehow voluntary. Tell that to the “working family” whose washing machine breaks down. The sales tax on that one purchase alone (roughly $39 on a $500 purchase) would eclipse the additional burden from the 2% income tax surcharge (roughly $23) on middle-income families.

Here’s the great thing about income taxes on working families during tough times – when their income drops so does their tax liability. This is not necessarily the case with sales taxes because families still have to make basic purchases and they typically rely on savings, debt and government assistance to in order to support themselves until their income level recovers.

If budget-negotiators are truly starting over from scratch to craft a tax package let’s hope they seek to understand how different types of taxes affect taxpayers of different income levels and act accordingly.


  1. […] objection to the income tax surcharge being imposed on working families. As Elaine Mejia wrote earlier in the week, the proposed 1% sales tax increase would have been far worse on low- and moderate-income […]

  2. Tom C

    August 8, 2009 at 8:32 am

    How does 1% of $500 become $39? Back in the days of old math, 1% of $500 was $5. If you’re saying the total tax would be $39, that’s fine but it’s an increase from $34 to $39, not from $0 to $39. The income tax increase is an actual increase regardless of purchasing decisions. Once taken from the taxpayer, it’s gone and can never be spent by the him/her for any purpose whatsoever.

Check Also

A public success story: North Carolina’s older adults are far less likely to live in poverty

According to data released last week by the ...

Top Stories from NCPW

  • News
  • Commentary

WASHINGTON – GOP megadonors and allies of President Trump are helping Sen. Thom Tillis bulk up his c [...]

The last time the Earth experienced a July this hot was well, we don’t know for sure. Such extremes [...]

Medicaid expansion is not just a moral imperative — it could provide a much-needed tonic for the fis [...]

Ag Commissioner Troxler opts in; 770 workers under Treasurer Folwell, Labor Commissioner Berry will [...]

When North Carolina officials put a stop, at least for the time being, to a badly mishandled contrac [...]

The post Cooper to Trump: “Not so fast” appeared first on NC Policy Watch. [...]

If there is a single brightest and most hopeful bit of news on the North Carolina public policy hori [...]

Thirty-two seconds. That’s how long it took for the madman responsible for the carnage in Dayton, Oh [...]