fbpx

Judges deliberating halting Senate decisions on Cooper’s appointees until lawsuit resolution

A three-judge panel did not decide from the bench Friday whether to temporarily block the Senate from making decisions on Gov. Roy Cooper’s cabinet appointees.

The panel issued a temporary restraining order earlier this week but heard arguments Friday about whether to issue a preliminary injunction for 25 days until the overall case is resolved.

Cooper’s attorney Jim Phillips, of Greensboro, made a separation of powers argument, stating that the legislative branch is encroaching on the executive branch by exercising advice and consent on Cooper’s appointees.

He also said that the threat of the legislature vetoing one of Cooper’s “most important powers” limits his appointee choices because he has to choose someone to appease the Senate.

“It has a chilling effect on the governor’s decision making,” Phillips said.

Martin Wharf, a Raleigh attorney representing Senate President Pro Tem Phil Berger and House Speaker Tim Moore, argued that a law passed by the General Assembly is constitutional “unless it is clearly prohibited.”

The Senate’s authority to give advice and consent does not take away the governor’s power to make appointments, he added.

Berger and Moore’s other attorney, Noah Huffstetler III argued that until the Senate moves forward with confirmation hearings, the harm to Cooper is just speculation — they don’t know what the process actually looks like or how long it will take.

He also said that the May 15 deadline Cooper has to formally submit his appointee names to the Senate is moot when he sends out press releases touting their qualifications and they begin doing “the people’s business.”

He added that it should be assumed Cooper and his aides conducted thorough vetting already of the appointees, but if they hadn’t, it was “all the more reason this confirmation process is necessary.”

Judge Jesse B. Caldwell III questioned Huffstetler about why confirmation hearings hadn’t been held in the past.

“If we have an executive branch that’s out of control, out of control, that needs to be reeled in … then why wasn’t this done before?” he asked.

Huffstetler said the hearings were not established as a reaction to Cooper being elected and that the legislature was a proponent of transparency.

“I think it’s just a good, sound public policy,” he said. “I believe that it’s probably overdue, your honor, that’s the best answer I can give.”

He added that just because it hadn’t been done in the past didn’t mean that it should stop them from doing it in the future.

Caldwell said if a preliminary injunction was ordered, it would not stop the Senate from holding hearings, it would only make their votes null and void until the lawsuit was settled.

Phillips argued that it should stop the hearings altogether because of the time it would require of appointees.

Caldwell and Judges Jeffrey B. Foster and L. Todd Burke will deliberate before making a decision.

Load More Related Articles
Load More By Melissa Boughton
Load More In Courts & the Law

Top Stories from NCPW

  • News
  • Commentary

Previous "compliance" issues of Torchlight Academy Schools, LLC leads advisory board to question proposal for Perquimans… [...]

WASHINGTON — When paid family leave was briefly dropped from congressional Democrats’ massive social spending and… [...]

The U.S. Interior Department recommended increased fees for oil and gas exploration on federal lands as… [...]

The new state budget, signed into law by Gov. Cooper, the General Assembly included a raft… [...]

Today, the U.S. Supreme Court, an institution that has upheld the basic right to legally access… [...]

Hint: It has something to do with the realities of a market economy “In less than a… [...]

These are, by any fair estimation, divided times in our country. Especially since the onset of… [...]

The post A Charlie Brown budget for NC’s schoolchildren appeared first on NC Policy Watch. [...]

Now Hiring

The North Carolina Justice Center is seeking a Courts, Law & Democracy Reporter for NC Policy Watch, to investigate, analyze and report on the federal and state judicial systems. This position will cover criminal and civil justice issues in the General Assembly and executive branch agencies, issues related to elections and voting, and other topics.

APPLY HERE.