Courts & the Law, News

Clerk refuses to name appellate judges who overturned halt on Election Board, Ethics Commission merge

WRAL published an article Friday about the North Carolina Court of Appeals refusing to disclose the names of the three judges who issued an order in an ongoing dispute between Democratic Gov. Roy Cooper and top GOP lawmakers.

That’s despite that fact that Phil Berger Jr., who was elected to the court in November, is the son of Sen. Phil Berger, R-Rockingham, one of the named defendants in the case. It’s unclear whether the younger Berger participated in the decision.

“Pursuant to policies and procedures established by the North Carolina Court of Appeals, the names of the judges who rule upon motions and petitions prior to the case being calendared for argument are not disclosed,” Dan Horne, clerk for the Court of Appeals, wrote in an email to WRAL News.

Pressed to make an exception to court policy in this case, Horne said, “The three judges who ruled upon this motion are deemed to have ruled on behalf of the entire court. For that reason, such orders are orders of the entire court and are issued under the Clerk of Court’s signature.”

The Court of Appeals overturned a lower court’s preliminary injunction last week in Cooper v. Berger, which challenges the constitutionality of Senate Bill 4. The bill, which was passed during a December special session, eradicates the current State Board of Elections and State Ethics Commission and merges their powers and duties into one new “Bipartisan Board.”

Cooper’s attorneys immediately filed an emergency motion with the state Supreme Court but a decision on whether justices will review the case has not yet been made. The North Carolina Administrative Office of the Courts has not yet released that emergency motion.

It should be noted that Senate Bill 4 also changed the appeals process — which affected this case favorably for the lawmakers. The bill eliminated a direct right of appeal to the state Supreme Court for final or interlocutory judgments that deem an act by the General Assembly unconstitutional.

Instead of the direct appeal to the state Supreme Court, which has a 4-3 Democratic majority, the appeal goes first to the state Court of Appeals, which has an 11-4 Republican majority.

The Appeals Court order was signed by Horne without the names of the judges attached, according to the WRAL article.

The elder Berger is the powerful president pro tem of the Senate, a position that gives him a great deal of say over what bills do and do not become law and a great deal of influence over the state budget. His son won election in November to the 15-member Court of Appeals, which hears cases and makes decisions in three-judge panels.

The younger Berger did not immediately respond to a call to his chambers or mobile phone asking if he was part of the panel. WRAL News had submitted a public records request to the court asking for records that would show those names.

“If they have a record that is applicable, they should turn it over,” said Jonathan Jones, director of the North Carolina Open Government Coalition.

Late Friday, the Horne replied, “We do not have a record that is responsive to your request.”

A spokesman for the elder Berger told WRAL that the senator did not know who the appellate judges were and that “this type of appellate court panel is anonymous.”

It’s an interesting response since earlier the same day his attorney touted in court that the General Assembly is all about transparency. That court hearing was another request for a preliminary injunction due to a constitutional challenge of Senate confirmation hearings.

One Comment


  1. Martha Shafer

    February 13, 2017 at 4:17 pm

    How can we make informed choices when we vote for Appellate Court judges if we aren’t allowed to know what decisions they’ve made?

Check Also

NC Court of Appeals throws out voter photo ID for now, says law likely passed with discriminatory intent

A three-judge North Carolina Court of Appeals panel ...

Top Stories from NCPW

  • News
  • Commentary

"Satirical" Facebook site seeks to promote Trump's re-election When Jonathan Jones sa [...]

Not everyone in North Carolina understands the implications of court fines and fees and how expenses [...]

A government budget not only details a state or nation’s financial priorities, but also serves as a [...]

When Billy Lassiter was 12 years old, he sat in the front row of one of his seventh grade classes su [...]

The lengths to which conservative ideologues and members of the Trump cult will go in order to avoid [...]

The post Causey & effect (with Lt. Gov. Dan Forest) appeared first on NC Policy Watch. [...]

For a man who knew everybody, Greg Lindberg might seem in the coming days like a man who knew nobody [...]

The evidence that racism is infecting the selection of juries in North Carolina is clear and unmista [...]