fbpx

Greensboro looks to learn from nationwide study on police review boards

If you’ve been following the tensions between the Greensboro Police Department, the community and the police complaint review board, you should read Susan Ladd’s latest column.

The columnist for Greensboro’s News & Record looks at a study of citizen boards for police oversight across the country – and what Greensboro and other N.C. cities can learn from it.

From her column:

The [Greensboro] PCRB generally conforms to what the study describes as the review-focused model of oversight boards, which are headed by civilian volunteers, review the quality of police internal affairs investigations, and make recommendations regarding its findings or requests further investigation.

And the PCRB is plagued by some of the weaknesses the study identifies in review models: it has limited authority, few organizational resources and is less independent than other forms of oversight. Because review boards focus on individual cases, their ability to promote systemic change within a law enforcement agency is limited. St. Petersburg, San Diego and Indianapolis also follow the review model.

Investigation-focused models (San Francisco, New York, Washington, D.C.) are generally staffed by paid civilian investigators who conduct independent investigations of complaints against police officers. These boards may even replace the police internal affairs process. They are the most independent, but they also are the most expensive form of oversight and face the strongest resistance from police departments, the study says.

Auditor/monitor-focused boards (Denver, New Orleans, Los Angeles) don’t focus on individual cases but use a paid staff with technical expertise to review police department records, case files and databases to determine patterns in complaints and make suggestions for improvement.

Many boards are organizational hybrids that combine different organizational forms and types of authority. A toolkit on NACOLE’s website includes examples of charter language, oversight policies and procedures, complaint forms, annual reports and other resources.

Load More Related Articles
Load More By Joe Killian
Load More In News

Top Stories from NCPW

  • News
  • Commentary

Parents, Democratic lawmakers decry censorship and "chilling effect on education" A controversial bill that would restrict… [...]

The proposal would allow survivors of domestic violence to testify remotely against their alleged abusers and… [...]

Giant pork producer asks Northamption County officials to sign off on proposal that would transport gas… [...]

Marcella Middleton grew up in foster care in Colorado and North Carolina and was taken to… [...]

Bills that elevate politics over science, research and training are an attack on the integrity of… [...]

Cannabis – aka marijuana. Most Americans already live in a state where it’s lawful to sell,… [...]

The post Hollowed-out history. appeared first on NC Policy Watch. [...]

The freedom to vote has faced serious challenges in recent years. New voting restrictions, rampant disinformation,… [...]

REPUBLISHING TERMS

You may republish this article online or in print under our Creative Commons license. You may not edit or shorten the text, you must attribute the article to The Pulse and you must include the author’s name in your republication.

If you have any questions, please email [email protected]

License

Creative Commons License AttributionCreative Commons Attribution
Greensboro looks to learn from nationwide study on police review boards