Courts & the Law, Defending Democracy, News

Berger appoints mostly GOP committee to look at judicial reform, redistricting

Senate President Pro Tem Phil Berger, whose chief of staff has been pushing a “merit” judicial section plan, has named a majority Republican committee to review judicial reform and redistricting.

Senators Dan Bishop (R-Mecklenburg), Warren Daniel (R-Burke) and Bill Rabon (R-Bladen) are co-chairs of the select committee on judicial reform and redistricting.

Rabon introduced a Constitutional amendment last week that would reform the judiciary by cutting all judgeship terms to two years and forcing all of the state’s judges to run for re-election next year.

The co-chairs are three of 10 Republican Senators names to the committee. The others are Dan Barrett (R-Davie), Chuck Edwards (R-Buncombe), Ralph Hise (R-Madison), Wesley Meredith (R-Cumberland), Paul Newton (R-Cabbarrus), Shirley Randleman (R-Stokes) and Norman Sanderson (R-Carteret).

Hise is currently under investigation for irregularities in his campaign finance reports.

There were five Democratic Senators appointed to the committee. They are Dan Blue (D-Wake), Jay Chaudhuri (D-Wake), Joel Ford (D-Mecklenburg), Floyd McKissick (D-Durham) and Terry Van Duyn (D-Buncombe).

In a statement, Berger said that the last 60 years has provided “haphazard and sometimes contradictory changes” to the state’s judiciary, and that he hopes Senators can have “thoughtful dialogue” on how to modernize, reform and strengthen the system.

”The judiciary touches every North Carolinian, so the conversation needs to include Republicans and Democrats, judges, legislators, district attorneys, clerks of court, executive branch officials, men and women of all races, and yes, even lawyers,” Berger wrote. “This committee will carefully consider all options on how we select judges, including the House’s judicial redistricting bill, merit selection models, retention elections, and, if we maintain a system of elections, their frequency and partisan structure.”

His hope is that the committee will meet a consensus on a recommendation to “modernize and strengthen” the courts.

One Comment


  1. Alan Falk

    October 26, 2017 at 1:17 am

    “Rabon introduced a Constitutional amendment last week that would reform the judiciary by cutting all judgeship terms to two years and forcing all of the state’s judges to run for re-election next year.” ???

    First, as I recently posted, this puts the Judiciary at the whim of the party in the Governor’s Mansion or the Majority in the State Houses… and that’s stupid and if anything, the terms of the judges should be LENGTHENED to span at least three or four Gubernatorial cycles to make such political influences impossible!

    Second… if the bill doesn’t describe EXPLICITLY, what “merit” means, how it will evaluated and with transparency, the goal and implementation boil down to more Gerrymandering and what’s affectionately known as “BS.”

Check Also

Three-judge panel won’t halt bill implementing voter ID during litigation

A three-judge panel Friday ruled it would not ...

Top Stories from NCPW

  • News
  • Commentary

There have been several high profiles departures at the North Carolina Department of Public Instruct [...]

The U.S. House on Thursday voted to hike the federal minimum wage to $15 per hour by 2025.  The meas [...]

Gov. Roy Cooper signed the controversial “Death by Distribution” bill into law last week. Under the [...]

Van der Vaart: supporter of Trump, critic of regulation, was in charge during some of the state [...]

The post …the Ventriloquist appeared first on NC Policy Watch. [...]

Linger long enough in Raleigh’s legislative lagoon and you’ll find there are three kinds of lawmaker [...]

There’s an old adage in the law that’s often used to describe situations in which a judge jails some [...]

The right-wing wallflowers of The Wall Street Journal reported Sunday, with an almost palpable sense [...]