Commentary

This morning’s “must read” editorial

Be sure to check out this morning’s lead editorial in Raleigh’s News & Observer, which is based in large measure on the reporting of Policy Watch’s award-winning Environmental Reporter, Lisa Sorg. As Sorg reported earlier this week, North Carolina’s latest proposed animal waste rules — an area already poorly regulated — pose numerous potential problems for the environment.

Here’s the N&O in “Bar set too low on NC hog waste”:

“At issue is the seemingly eternal question about rules related to hog farms and poultry farms: At what point are stronger rules needed to minimize the impact of waste disposal – that impact being odor in nearby communities and the aging of waste lagoons that can result in a sort of leakage into lakes, streams, rivers and other types of wetlands?

Those who favor limited rules argue current regulations are adequate because the waste, some of which is used as fertilizer, doesn’t enter waterways or wetlands. It’s called ‘non-discharge,’ which means rules are viewed, by environmentalists, as not as strong as those governing the discharge of waste into those lakes and rivers.

But, says Will Hendrick, manager of the Waterkeeper Alliance’s Pure Farms/Pure Waters campaign, “We believe it’s legal fiction that they are non-discharge operations. Some modicum of monitoring is appropriate.”

Lisa Sorg of the excellent public interest advocacy group NC Policy Watch reported the issue recently. And the monitoring that Hendrick is talking about, she wrote, is not happening because ‘since this wastewater is classified as “non-discharge,” it’s not subject to air, surface water or groundwater monitoring or enforcement. And what you don’t look for, you can’t find.’”

After explaining that the opposition to strong rules is driven by those who worry about harming the economy, the editorial ends this way:

“The problem is, good regulation isn’t about hurting industry; it’s about protecting finite natural resources that once spoiled will not come back. Water is one. But livability is another. When the odor from hog farm operations makes it difficult for neighbors, it also makes it difficult for an area to attract other types of industry. And, most important, if in the name of prosperity and deregulation (two things that don’t necessarily go together), water resources, ultimately drinking water resources, are put at risk by wastewater runoff or even a spill that amounts to an environmental catastrophe, the economic consequences for a region will be long-lasting if not permanent.

It’s wise to look skeptically at any attempts to weaken environmental regulation, because changes should have a high bar to clear. In North Carolina, under Republicans determined to deregulate virtually everything, that bar has been set way too low.”

Click here to access all of Sorg’s remarkable collection of environmental stories.

Check Also

Amendments court challenge: You won’t believe what the Berger-Moore brief tells the court

In the age of Donald Trump, it’s becoming ...

Top Stories from NCPW

  • News
  • Commentary

Public school demographics in the United States are shifting, but, based on emerging national data, [...]

Ninety-nine years ago today, a stalemate between two states nearly derailed the women's suffrag [...]

The emails began going out at the University of North Carolina earlier this summer. Warnings that fe [...]

Litigation over the November election ballot is not likely to end anytime soon, but absentee by-mail [...]

The post The Power Grab appeared first on NC Policy Watch. [...]

North Carolina made history again Monday, the not-so-bad kind. If you were in earshot of Raleigh Mon [...]

A summer of hectic twists and turns has made it increasingly clear: The North Carolina General Assem [...]

The highest profile public policy debate in North Carolina in the summer of 2018 revolves around the [...]