Top 10 class-size chaos talking points

Male Pupil In High School Art Class

The General Assembly returns to Raleigh on Wednesday, January 10. Public school advocates across the state will be pressing for leadership to bring an end to the class-size chaos inflicted upon North Carolina school districts via the General Assembly’s unfunded class-size mandate.

As most readers know, the General Assembly has passed a law requiring school districts to substantially lower class sizes in grades K-3 beginning in the 2018-19 school year. However, the General Assembly has failed to provide districts with the operating and capital funds necessary to implement the mandate. To meet the unfunded mandate, districts will need to find other sources of funds to hire additional K-3 teachers. Many districts are resorting to reducing “enhancement” courses such as art, music, PE, or technology. Others are dramatically increasing class sizes in grades 4 and 5 to shift those teachers to lower grades. Neither strategy is in the best interest of students, but without funding, districts have few options.

January represents a great opportunity for the General Assembly to right this wrong. Fixing the problem can be done at no cost if the General Assembly were simply to repeal the unfunded class-size requirement. The problem needs to be fixed well before the General Assembly’s next session in May to allow school districts to properly budget for next year. Still, advocates are running into a common set of talking points from General Assembly members (mostly in the Senate) who are strangely committed to their unfunded class-size policy. The responses below will hopefully assist public school advocates in overcoming the most common General Assembly excuses.

  1. “We’ve fully-funded the class-size requirements”

In FY 2013-14, school districts had to maintain an average class-size ratio of one teacher for every 21 students in grades K-3. Based on the number of students in those grades, it requires nearly 6,600 additional teachers to bring class sizes down to the levels required in FY 2018-19. The General Assembly provided some additional teacher funds in the 2014 and 2016 budgets, increasing teacher funding by approximately $120 million per year, the equivalent of about 1,850 teachers. In order to be able to meet the FY 2018-19 class size requirement, districts still need nearly 4,750 additional teachers, at a cost of about $300 million.

The General Assembly’s own budget bill shows that the mandate remains unfunded. Following the passage of this year’s budget, General Assembly leaders passed a “technical corrections” bill. The bill includes language admitting to their failure to fund next year’s class-size mandate, saying that it is the General Assembly’s “intent” to provide the funding at some point in the future.

  1. “We need more data on how districts are spending their teacher money”

DPI publishes data showing whether a school district has transferred their classroom teacher money for other uses. In FY 2016-17, just four districts transferred any money out of their classroom teacher allotment. The transfers totaled just $1.1 million. In that same year, districts received $4.1 billion of classroom teacher money. In other words, districts spent 99.972 percent of their classroom teacher money on teachers last year. Clearly, districts are spending their teacher money on teachers and there is no lack of data preventing General Assembly action.

  1. “We had no idea it would cause this many issues”

According to Kris Nordstrom, a former staffer with the General Assembly’s nonpartisan Fiscal Research Division, General Assembly budget writers were warned of the negative impacts of their class size requirements as far back as 2015. In addition to warnings from staff, General Assembly budget writers received warnings from multiple school district finance officers.

  1. “Fixing this can wait until May”

State law requires superintendents to submit budget requests to their boards of education by May 1 of each year. Additionally, districts must begin the process of making personnel decisions. Districts are required to provide written notice to dismissed teachers, provide procedures for appeals, and make payments for accumulated leave. Such decisions will need to be made well in advance of the start of the short session in May.

  1. “The adjournment resolution prevents us from addressing class size in January”

The General Assembly gets to change laws whenever they want to. If leadership wants to change the terms of the adjournment resolution, they can.

Regardless, fixing the unfunded class-size mandate falls within the terms of the adjournment resolution. The resolution permits “Bills making technical corrections to S.L. 2017 57, S.L. 2017 119, or both.” S.L. 2017-57 is the very budget bill that fails to fund the class-size requirements that go into effect in FY 2018-19. Yet Sen. Berger and Rep. Moore are under the incorrect assumption that they already funded the FY 18-19 class-size requirements. Clearly, there was an error in S.L. 2017-57 that needs correcting.

  1. “School districts have just misspent the money we gave them”

In the two years that the unfunded class-size issue has been debated, not one member has provided any evidence of this claim. As explained above, districts spent 99.972 percent of their classroom teacher money on teachers in FY 2016-17. Additionally, every district in the state supplements the teacher positions provided by the State classroom teacher allotment by: 1) hiring additional teachers from State funds in other allotments and 2) using federal and local funds. Statewide, districts hire 47 percent more teachers than are provided via the classroom teacher allotment. Districts are already going above and beyond to fill holes in the state’s insufficient funding of teachers.

  1. “Districts don’t have to build more classrooms, they can just use innovative approaches like co-teaching”

It is unclear where this claim comes from. Have members conducted a physical audit of school capacity across the state? According to a recent polling of elementary teachers, their classrooms would not be able to physically accommodate the number of students necessary to implement co-teaching approaches to meet the class-size requirements. Further, there is zero evidence that students in large co-taught classrooms with multiple teachers receive the same educational benefits as students in smaller classrooms with one teacher.

  1. “We’ll fix this with a school bond”

First, there’s no indication that the General Assembly has any intention to pass the Public School Building Bond Act. They did not bring it to a floor vote last year.

Second, the proposed state bond would only provide schools with $1.9 billion of funding capacity. According to the 2015-16 Statewide Facility Needs Survey, North Carolina school districts have $8.1 billion of facility needs, and that was before taking into account the additional costs created by the unfunded class-size mandate.

Finally, the unfunded class-size mandate goes into effect July 1, 2018. Clearly, no facilities will be built by any yet-to-be-authorized state bonds before July 1.

  1. “This is just a Wake County issue”

A brief review of newspapers across the state shows that the unfunded class-size mandate is creating unnecessary budget and operational issues in the following districts: Alamance-Burlington, Asheville CityBertieBrunswickBuncombe CountyChapel Hill-CarrboroCharlotte MecklenburgClinton CityCravenDurhamElizabeth City-PasquotankForsythGreeneGuilfordHendersonIredell-StatesvilleJohnstonLeeNew HanoverNorthamptonOnslowOrangePenderRowan-SalisburySampsonSurry, and Warren.

  1. “I support public schools”

Lawmakers must prove this claim by repealing the unfunded class-size mandate this January.

Looking for more information? Join us today, Monday 12/18 4:30-5pm for a Face Book Live discussion on the #ClassSizeChaos issue and to learn about next steps for taking action throughout January.  Hosted by the NC Justice Center and Pubic Schools First. Can’t make the discussion? Spread the word by sharing with family and friends. And join us and other public school advocates from across the state on January 6th for the Rally to End Class Size Chaos at 1 pm on the Halifax Mall.

Load More Related Articles
Load More By Kris Nordstrom
Load More In Commentary

Top Stories from NCPW

  • News
  • Commentary

WASHINGTON — Nearly 100 House Democrats are pushing the Senate to expand immigration protections in President… [...]

In November of 2018, a blue wave brought election victory to Democrats in North Carolina and… [...]

WASHINGTON — Congressional Democrats cheered on the floor of the U.S. House after approving President Joe… [...]

North Carolina Award recipient Dudley Flood reflects on a lifetime of combating segregation and improving public… [...]

The post A Charlie Brown budget for NC’s schoolchildren appeared first on NC Policy Watch. [...]

You’d think, at some point, the folks who lead the North Carolina Republican Party might experience… [...]

The post What they are thankful for… appeared first on NC Policy Watch. [...]

Now Hiring

The North Carolina Justice Center is seeking a Courts, Law & Democracy Reporter for NC Policy Watch, to investigate, analyze and report on the federal and state judicial systems. This position will cover criminal and civil justice issues in the General Assembly and executive branch agencies, issues related to elections and voting, and other topics.