News

The link between conservative professors advising UNC Board of Governors

In the last few weeks, the UNC Board of Governors has been looking for advice on promoting intellectual diversity and civil discourse on campuses.

Specifically, the board has looked for that advice from two prominent conservative professors from private schools whose work and academic centers are funded by conservative foundations openly engaged in a political culture war.

Regular readers of the Progressive Pulse will remember James Otteson, professor at Wake Forest University, from a previous piece by Rob Schofield.

That piece concentrated primarily on Otteson’s connections to the Koch Brothers’ Charles Koch Foundation.

It’s also worth looking at Otteson’s connection to the Thomas W. Smith Foundation.

The Smith Foundation counts among its board members James Piereson, the former director of the John M. Olin Foundation.

Piereson and the Olin Foundation are two interesting links between Otteson and Robert George, the conservative professor from Princeton hosted by the board at its meeting last week.

While heading up the Olin Foundation, Piereson wrote a very frank 2005 essay about the best ways for conservative funders to establish “beachheads” of conservative thought at universities, to maintain outside influence on them and circumvent concerns about academic freedom – all to promote conservative values and ideals and bring the “house of cards” of traditional academia crashing down.

Critics of the UNC Board of Governors’ recent direction on these issues – which includes a number of student and faculty groups – say if the board is actually concerned with intellectual diversity and civil discourse, it may need to cast its net a little wider than the most conservative professors and programs they can find, set on private university campuses, funded by private conservative organizations.

One Comment


  1. Kevin McCormick

    December 22, 2017 at 10:40 am

    What’s your concern here? That the ‘liberal’ stranglehold on higher education might actually be loosened to allow for dissenting thinkers? For at least five decades there has been an unwritten policy to weed out all academic voices which do not worship at the altar of ‘progressive’ thought. Believe it or not, there are other people in the world who are quite intelligent but who believe that, at the very least, to have a conversation about ideas there should be a legitimate balance of voices. Students should have an opportunity to actually decide for themselves the best answers to the great questions of life and they can’t do that if they continually hear one only side of the arguments. What this brief article reveals is that those professors who do not pass the liberal bias test have to find creative ways to have any presence at all on college campuses.

Check Also

Eastern North Carolina residents press for a just hurricane recovery

As lawmakers gathered Monday to approve funding for ...

Top Stories from NCPW

  • News
  • Commentary

The following set of figures comes from the Center on Budget & Policy Priorities' new repor [...]

For more than four months, the Guilford County school system failed to disclose critical information [...]

If Janice Franklin has an extra $10 to spare, she’s not thinking about using it to buy a photo ident [...]

The UNC Board of Governors is changing the process by which it selects chancellors for UNC system sc [...]

The post Nix all Six appeared first on NC Policy Watch. [...]

When lawmakers convene next week for a second special session of the North Carolina General Assembly [...]

Long after the presidents, and the governors, and the press conferences cease, and the swollen river [...]

It would be bad enough if North Carolina’s junior senator, Thomas “Thom” Tillis, had merely voted to [...]