Courts & the Law, Defending Democracy, News

Gerrymandering plaintiffs: Supreme Court should not block special master’s plan

The U.S. Supreme Court should reject North Carolina lawmakers’ request to block a special master’s districts from being used in this year’s elections, according to a response filed Friday.

The response in North Carolina v. Covington, an ongoing racial gerrymandering case, was due by noon today. The Supreme Court will now make a decision about whether or not to block the legislative districts drawn by a special master and revert to a remedial map drawn by the legislature.

The plaintiffs allege in their response that lawmakers have returned to the Supreme Court “so that they can hang on to the fruits of their racial-gerrymandering labor for at least one more election cycle.”

“There is no justification for an emergency stay in this case,” the document states.

You can read the full filing below.

17A790 North Carolina v. Covington Stay Response by NC Policy Watch on Scribd

Check Also

Elections sites won’t display ‘No Photo ID Required’ signs

Early voters might notice something a little different ...

Top Stories from NCPW

  • News
  • Commentary

If North Carolina goes forward with the recommendation to allow a private charter operator to take c [...]

Early voting starts today, which means North Carolinians will finally get to decide on six proposed [...]

The legislature expedited its first round of disaster relief funding for the state's critical r [...]

The following set of figures comes from the Center on Budget & Policy Priorities' new repor [...]

There are a lot of strange – even downright bizarre – aspects to the ongoing effort by North Carolin [...]

The power of the vote extends beyond any single electoral outcome. It has the potential to lift up i [...]

The post Nix all Six appeared first on NC Policy Watch. [...]

When lawmakers convene next week for a second special session of the North Carolina General Assembly [...]