Courts & the Law, Defending Democracy, News

Gerrymandering plaintiffs: Supreme Court should not block special master’s plan

The U.S. Supreme Court should reject North Carolina lawmakers’ request to block a special master’s districts from being used in this year’s elections, according to a response filed Friday.

The response in North Carolina v. Covington, an ongoing racial gerrymandering case, was due by noon today. The Supreme Court will now make a decision about whether or not to block the legislative districts drawn by a special master and revert to a remedial map drawn by the legislature.

The plaintiffs allege in their response that lawmakers have returned to the Supreme Court “so that they can hang on to the fruits of their racial-gerrymandering labor for at least one more election cycle.”

“There is no justification for an emergency stay in this case,” the document states.

You can read the full filing below.

17A790 North Carolina v. Covington Stay Response by NC Policy Watch on Scribd

Check Also

Lawmakers will hear public comment on Congressional maps tomorrow

Congressional redistricting at the North Carolina legislature appears ...

Top Stories from NCPW

  • News
  • Commentary

North Carolinians were presented with more than a dozen congressional maps by Tuesday night and had [...]

After a weeks-long storm of investigations, leaks and accusations of unethical behavior on North Car [...]

When it began in 1919, it was “Armistice Day” — a celebration of the end of World War I. It became a [...]

Peter Romary worked for UNC board member Tom Fetzer, but claimed connections to Senate leader Phil B [...]

“The hymn in church yesterday,” Dan Gerlach, the embattled former ECU interim chancellor, tweeted Su [...]

Back in the early 1990’s, the late and sorely missed Bob Hensley – a talented, feisty and frequently [...]

The post Berger on shaky ground appeared first on NC Policy Watch. [...]

Today marks 100 days since I filed an official request with the Department of Public Instruction to [...]