Which judges are double-bunked in the new maps? Here’s a list

Lawmakers have said they won’t be back until May to take up judicial redistricting, but dropped two new maps before adjourning a special session this week.

The maps this time were released with incumbency information, but not without errors. NC Policy Watch analyzed the information (again) and found that there are more judges double-bunked in the new proposals (Options B and C) than in the Option A map that was dropped two weeks prior.

You can read about the analyses here. The list of double-bunked judges in Options B and C in the district court and superior court maps can be found below. You can read all about the Option A maps here.

It should be noted, as before in other stories, “double-bunking” for the purposes of this data means that there are a smaller number of seats in a judicial district than there are current sitting judges. That means incumbent judges in those areas would either be forced to run against another incumbent in an election or face losing their seat if their term expires after the seats are filled.

Editor’s note: The two Superior Court tables have been updated to reflect an additional double-bunking in Forsyth County.

District Court Double Bunkings - Option B - Feb 2018

Superior Court Double Bunkings - Option B - Feb 2018

District Court Double Bunkings - Option C - Feb 2018

Superior Court Double Bunkings - Option C - Feb 2018

Republish