fbpx

Voters will decide if lawmakers can appoint judicial vacancies, pack state Supreme Court

North Carolina voters will officially get to decide in November whether lawmakers should get the power to appoint judicial candidates to the bench when there is a vacancy.

The House gained a vote Thursday during the third reading of Senate Bill 814, the “Judicial Vacancy Sunshine Amendment,” passing it 73 to 45. That means the constitutional amendment will be put on November’s ballot for an up or down vote by the public because the Senate already passed the measure.

SB814 establishes a commission that would vet judicial candidates submitted by the public as “qualified” or “unqualified.” The commission would put forth the “qualified” candidates to the General Assembly, which would then give the Governor at least two of their top picks for him to appoint to a judicial vacancy.

The makeup or function of the commission is left to be determined by lawmakers at a later time if the public passes the amendment.

Democratic Leader Darren Jackson pointed out during the floor debate Thursday that the real point of the amendment was to give his Republican colleagues the power to pack the state Supreme Court during a lame duck session before the end of the year if Anita Earls loses the election.

Earls, a registered Democrat and prominent voting and civil rights attorney who established the Southern Coalition for Social Justice, is challenging incumbent Barbara Jackson, who is a registered Republican, for a seat on the state Supreme Court.

Jackson said if Earls loses, the balance of the court remains a 4-3 Democratic majority. At that point, Republicans could vote to add two seats to the bench and then appoint the vacancies they create, shifting the balance to 5-4 Republican majority.

The Supreme Court is the highest court in North Carolina, and makes decisions in key constitutional arguments, including redistricting and separation of powers cases.

Jackson invited House members to call him out if his theory was wrong that packing the Supreme Court was part of their plan. No one corrected him.

“This is a court packing amendment to the state constitution and I’m against it,” Jackson said.

Rep. David Lewis (R-Harnett) said the amendment did not change North Carolinians’ right to vote for their judges, something Republicans understood they wanted.

“I understand the frustration levels are getting high in here, I understand people are getting tired,” he said. “To view this as anything other than a genuine attempt to find a way to fill judicial vacancies is just plain wrong.”

Republican lawmakers voted down two amendments by Democrats to change SB814.

Load More Related Articles
Load More By Melissa Boughton
Load More In Courts & the Law

Top Stories from NCPW

  • News
  • Commentary

Hawaii Sen. Brian Schatz is trying to cut a last minute deal that could bring tens… [...]

For the third year in a row, Decarcerate Now NC will host a vigil outside the… [...]

Tillis and Burr 'aye' votes help assure measure could not be filibustered WASHINGTON — The U.S.… [...]

Early voting in the U.S. Senate runoff got off to a busy start in Georgia, with… [...]

U.S. Marine vet from North Carolina: Congress should pass the Afghan Adjustment Act ASAP More than… [...]

It’s an age-old, chicken and egg discussion: Is it extant societal forces of exclusion, hatred and… [...]

The post At the corner of Partisan and Politics appeared first on NC Policy Watch. [...]

Maybe the change was an inevitable byproduct of our current charged and contentious era. Maybe it… [...]

REPUBLISHING TERMS

You may republish this article online or in print under our Creative Commons license. You may not edit or shorten the text, you must attribute the article to The Pulse and you must include the author’s name in your republication.

If you have any questions, please email [email protected]

License

Creative Commons License AttributionCreative Commons Attribution
Voters will decide if lawmakers can appoint judicial vacancies, pack state Supreme Court