Courts & the Law, Defending Democracy

Anglin, Edwards will officially be on November ballot with party labels

Rebecca Edwards and Chris Anglin

North Carolina lawmakers gave up their fight yesterday to keep some judicial candidates from appearing on the November ballot with their party labels.

The state Court of Appeals declined earlier in the week to stay a lower court’s ruling that Chris Anglin, a registered Republican running for a state Supreme Court seat, and Rebecca Edwards, a registered Democrat running for a Wake County District Court seat, could remain on the ballot with their chosen party label.

An attorney for lawmakers notified parties to the cases that they would not seek Supreme Court review.

“Petitioners strongly disagree with [the Court of Appeals] determination, but, in the interests of allowing the Bipartisan State Board of Elections and Ethics Enforcement to finalize the content to appear on the ballot and to avoid unintentionally furthering voter confusion about the status of these candidates or the ballot itself, Petitioners will not seek further review of the trial court’s preliminary injunction order in this Court,” the court document states.

Anglin used to be a registered Democrat and Edwards used to be a registered Republican. Both changed their affiliation before filing for judicial candidacy but according to the law at the time. Lawmakers had retroactively enacted a law mandating a 90-day registration requirement for judicial candidates but the lower court ruled it violated Anglin’s and Edwards’ constitutional rights.

The State Board, which must begin ballot preparation and printing by Saturday, agreed to treat the other two affected judicial candidates like Anglin and Edwards, so all judicial candidates will have their party label listed on the ballot.

Martin Warf represented lawmakers in the cases. John Burns and Bo Caudill represented Anglin and Narendra Ghosh and Kenneth Soo represented Edwards. (Ghosh is a board member of the North Carolina Justice Center, the parent organization to NC Policy Watch.)

2018.08.28 Notice of Withdrawal of Appeal – 4810-8177-8289 v 1 by NC Policy Watch on Scribd

2018.08.28 Notice of Withdrawal of Appeal – 4846-2026-3537 v 1 by NC Policy Watch on Scribd

Check Also

A “Raise the Age” breakdown by districts across the state

North Carolina officially implemented Raise the Age legislation ...

Top Stories from NCPW

  • News
  • Commentary

North Carolina is projected to gain a U.S. House seat in the coming years, recent data show — a chan [...]

New facilities and policies offer hope to 16 and 17 year-olds once consigned to the adult correction [...]

State Rep. Holly Grange (R-New Hanover) failed to disclose a business owned and operated by her husb [...]

By the time the new Interstate 885 opens in Durham later this year, some of the people who conceived [...]

There is a temptation—and believe me, I understand it—to celebrate the fleeting nature of this week’ [...]

The North Carolina General Assembly is back in Raleigh this week and, as noted in this space last Fr [...]

The post DTH making its mark on Silent Sam settlement appeared first on NC Policy Watch. [...]

A long road remains to be traveled before North Carolinians find out whether they’ll have to show an [...]