Commentary, News

Irony alert: Billionaire behind “Marsy’s Law” victims’ rights amendment becomes a criminal defendant

Here’s an interesting news story from a few weeks’ back that probably deserves more attention in light of the so-called “victims’ rights” amendment dubbed “Marsy’s Law” that North Carolina voters are being asked to pass judgment on this fall: the man behind it is getting a look at the criminal justice system from a different perspective — that of criminal defendant.

As the Nevada Current noted last week in an article on Marsy’s Law (that state will also vote on the proposed constitutional amendment this fall), Henry Nicholas, the billionaire who launched the Marsy’s Law movement in response to his daughter’s tragic murder by her boyfriend 35 years ago, was arrested in Las Vegas last month on suspicion of drug trafficking.

As the Los Angeles Times reported at the time:

“Broadcom co-founder and billionaire Henry T. Nicholas III was arrested in Las Vegas on suspicion of narcotics trafficking after police discovered heroin, cocaine, meth and ecstasy in his suite at the Encore hotel, police said Thursday.

Las Vegas Metropolitan police detained Nicholas, 59, and a woman, Ashley Fargo, about 10:40 p.m. Tuesday after hotel security called the police to the room, said Officer Larry Hadfield, a department spokesman. Hadfield said security reported finding contraband in the room.”

The story goes on  to point out that Nicholas has actually had several run-ins with the law in recent years, including previous indictments for drug violations and illegal stock trading.

The irony here, of course, is that, as many critics of Marsy’s Law have noted, one big potential problem with the proposal is that it could pose serious problems for the rights of criminal defendants who could see their rights to justice compromised as prosecutors elevate the rights of crime victims over the search for justice in individual cases.

Of course, given that Nicholas is rich and seems to have been accused mostly of “victimless crimes,” perhaps he isn’t too worried about such collateral damage from his law. Unfortunately, for those who lack access to teams of expensive defense attorneys and/or are accused of crimes with sympathetic and outspoken victims, Nicholas’s law is likely to cause great injustice.

One Comment


  1. JRobert

    September 10, 2018 at 12:18 pm

    People are missing the key points:

    1- The under represented in society are more likely the victims of violence and abuse and crime
    2- The victims are then re-victimized in a process that puts criminals a head of them in the judicial process

    Point 1 and 2 have nothing to do with Dr. Nicholas.

    There is a large coalition of both progressives and conservatives and moderates that support the amendment, for good reason.

Check Also

Editorial: What Rep. David Lewis ought to be saying about Voter ID and next week’s legislative session

Be sure to check out the lead editorial ...

Top Stories from NCPW

  • News
  • Commentary

When North Carolina Democrats and Common Cause N.C. filed a suit in Wake County Superior Court last [...]

Breaking the Republicans’ veto-proof majority was the Democrats’ and voting rights activists’ short [...]

The Joint Subcommittee on the Atlantic Coast Pipeline voted Wednesday to launch an investigation int [...]

North Carolina is not the only state whose transgender state employees and dependents are without in [...]

If you’re looking for a hopeful sign about modern North Carolina, here’s a small one to buoy your sp [...]

Tony Maxwell, a retired African-American naval officer, was trying to get his Jacksonville, Florida [...]

The post The 2018 Midterms: Cutting off the nose to spite the face appeared first on NC Policy Watch [...]

Despite the manufactured panic of the migrant caravan, despite the midterm’s so-called “referendum o [...]