Courts & the Law, Defending Democracy, News

Plaintiffs ask U.S. Supreme Court to affirm partisan gerrymandering rulings

The League of Women Voters and Common Cause has asked the U.S. Supreme Court to affirm a lower court’s second opinion that the state’s 2016 congressional map is the result of unconstitutional partisan gerrymandering.

The high court sent League of Women Voters v. Rucho and Common Cause v. Rucho back down to a three-judge panel of the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina for consideration after justices released opinions in two other similar partisan gerrymandering cases: Gill v. Whitford, a challenge to Republican partisan gerrymandering in Wisconsin, and Benisek v. Lamone, a challenge to a Democratic partisan gerrymander in Maryland.

The panel came to the same decision it did the first time around and struck down 13 congressional districts as unconstitutional partisan gerrymanders.

“In its thorough decision, the district court scrupulously followed this roadmap,” states one of the motions to affirm the panel’s findings. “For each North Carolina congressional district in which it found standing to allege partisan vote dilution, the court held that the district had packed or cracked Democratic voters. The court further held that a plaintiff living in each district could have been unpacked or uncracked by an alternative map.”

The League of Women Voters plaintiffs ask the high court to summarily affirm the panel’s findings “since this case’s exceptional facts violate any plausible gerrymandering standard.” They acknowledge, however, in the document that the importance of the issue may warrant a full briefing.

Common Cause plaintiffs ask for the same.

“The blatant partisan gerrymandering in North Carolina has robbed voters of their voice for at least three election cycles and it will do so again in November,” said Bob Phillips, executive director of Common Cause North Carolina. “The legislative leaders’ unmitigated gall in manipulating district lines for partisan power brings into sharp focus how serious partisan gerrymandering is. If the Supreme Court takes this case, we are confident we will ultimately prevail.”

Rick Hasen, a professor of law and political science at the University of California Irvine School of Law, said on his Election Law Blog that he expects the Supreme Court to set the case for argument. He added that he believes the chances the court will affirm the panel’s findings are law with Justice Brett Kavanaugh now on the court.

Read both full requests to affirm below:

18-422 Motion to Affirm by NC Policy Watch on Scribd

Rucho v Common Cause Motion to Affirm by the Common Cause Appellees 11-2-18 by NC Policy Watch on Scribd

Check Also

NC Court of Appeals throws out voter photo ID for now, says law likely passed with discriminatory intent

A three-judge North Carolina Court of Appeals panel ...

Top Stories from NCPW

  • News
  • Commentary

North Carolina House Speaker Tim Moore (R-Cleveland) is seeking the open chancellor’s position at Ea [...]

A public schools advocacy group is calling on North Carolina leaders to take “immediate and intentio [...]

"Satirical" Facebook site seeks to promote Trump's re-election When Jonathan Jones sa [...]

Not everyone in North Carolina understands the implications of court fines and fees and how expenses [...]

After a few months of unemployment I was going stir-crazy so I got a job as a cashier at a local gro [...]

Say this for North Carolina House Speaker Tim Moore and his surrogates, they are determined con arti [...]

The lengths to which conservative ideologues and members of the Trump cult will go in order to avoid [...]

The post Causey & effect (with Lt. Gov. Dan Forest) appeared first on NC Policy Watch. [...]