Postmaster general insists it’s his ‘sacred duty’ to ensure election mail on time

Postmaster General Louis DeJoy delivering online testimony to the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee

WASHINGTON — Postmaster General Louis DeJoy mounted a strong defense of his record Friday during a high-profile Senate hearing on recent postal delays, calling claims that the Trump administration is trying to sabotage the elections by deliberately disrupting mail service “outrageous.”

DeJoy acknowledged delays during the pandemic but said the agency is fully capable of delivering election mail on time and said successful elections are his “sacred duty” and main priority this fall.  The postmaster general, a former logistics company executive from North Carolina, took over the job in June. He is a top donor to President Donald Trump, and was the finance chairman of the Republican National Convention Host Committee.

Rebutting allegations that he’s acting at Trump’s bidding, DeJoy said he had not spoken to Trump about policy changes he has made since taking the position and has only informed Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin of his general intention to improve processes and save costs at the cash-strapped agency.

In May, the U.S. House approved $25 billion for the Postal Service in a $3 trillion coronavirus relief package. Trump said last week on Fox News that he opposes some funding because he doesn’t want it used for mail-in votes, repeating his claim that it would lead to “fraudulent” election results.

DeJoy spoke before the Republican-led Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee, which is chaired by GOP Sen. Ron Johnson of Wisconsin. Johnson sought to cast DeJoy in a friendly light ahead of a Democratic-led hearing on the issue in the U.S. House on Monday. That House Oversight and Reform hearing will feature DeJoy again as well as Robert Duncan, chair of the U.S. Postal Service Board of Governors.

“I think you should be commended, not condemned,” Johnson said.

In his remarks, Johnson called DeJoy the target of a political hit job by Democrats, whom he charged with “ginning up” controversy for political gain. Johnson accused the media of willingly playing along with a “false narrative” that the GOP is disrupting mail service to suppress Democratic votes.

Michigan Sen. Gary Peters, the ranking Democrat on the panel, countered Johnson, saying complaints about mail service delays “are not manufactured.” He held up a chart depicting a significant drop in on-time mail delivery this summer and cited an investigation that has yielded thousands of complaints. “These are real people,” he said.

Peters said DeJoy owed Americans both an apology and an explanation for delays that have prevented them from timely receipt of medicine, paychecks, benefit statements and more.

Peters concluded at the end of the hearing that he was not satisfied with DeJoy’s responses.

Earlier this week, DeJoy said he would suspend some initiatives to avoid a possible appearance of impropriety. Those changes he’d undertaken involve overtime rules, retail hours at local post offices, and the location of mail processing equipment and blue collection boxes, according to a statement.

He also said he wouldn’t close existing mail processing facilities and would use “standby” resources as of Oct. 1 to meet mail surges.

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) called his pledge “wholly insufficient” and said it would not reverse damage done.

She said DeJoy won’t replace mail machines that have already been removed and has no plans for “adequate” overtime. “All of these changes directly jeopardize the election and disproportionately threaten to disenfranchise voters in communities of color,” she said in a statement.

DeJoy explained at the hearing that retiring blue boxes and mail sorting machines is routine procedure and said some machines had been removed to account for a recent increase in the volume of package mail. He said he has not eliminated or curtailed overtime pay and noted that he did not direct closures of post offices and has since suspended them.

DeJoy also said in an exchange with Peters that he will not bring back any mail processing machines that have been removed because they’re not needed.

According to the USPS Equipment Reduction Plan issued in May, five post offices in North Carolina were scheduled to lose mail processing machines:

  • Charlotte, 21% reduction, from 41 to 32 machines;
  • Fayetteville, 29% reduction, a drop from 14 to 10 machines;
  • Greensboro, a decrease of 23%, from 38 to 29 machines;
  • Raleigh, 21% decrease, from 32 to 25 machines;
  • Rocky Mount, 12.5% reduction, from eight to seven machines.

The U.S. House will meet tomorrow in a rare weekend session to vote on a measure providing $25 billion in Postal Service funding and barring the agency from changing operations or service levels in place at the beginning of the year.

The Postal Service generates almost all of its revenue through its operations but Congress has at times provided some additional appropriations. The Congressional Research Service reported earlier this year that the post office has continued to incur losses for at least a decade and its expenses in fiscal 2019 were $80 billion while its revenues were $71 billion. The pandemic has only exacerbated those problems.

Load More Related Articles
Load More By Allison Stevens
Load More In News

Top Stories from NCPW

  • News
  • Commentary

The Commonwealth Fund, a nonprofit that promotes high-quality health systems, publishes a scorecard each year that… [...]

As LGBTQ Pride month came to a close this past week, queer people in North Carolina… [...]

County sheriffs and jailers could challenge violations uncovered during jail inspections conducted by the NC Department… [...]

 The U.S. Supreme Court ruled Thursday the Environmental Protection Agency does not have the authority to… [...]

The North Carolina General Assembly brought its 2022 “short session” to a close last week. Well,… [...]

The post SCOTUS and the next explosive case for Democracy appeared first on NC Policy Watch. [...]

Last week’s U.S. Supreme Court’s ruling that Americans no longer have a constitutional right to control… [...]

The United States of America is no longer a free country. Women are no longer full… [...]